Skip to content

meetings

What An MBA Didn’t Teach You About Sales

The sales profession is challenging. You need to work hard at it to succeed. You need to learn from the best. You need to improve your skills continuously. If you think you can sell since you are a hit at parties and have a lot of friends, you may soon find that you are a failure as a salesperson. Blunt truth:

because the sales profession is so hard, you have to focus on doing everything in sales very well, or you will be considered a failure.

I call this blog, Skinned Knees because I try to relate all of the learning that I have done over the past 4+ decades (while skinning my knees in the learning process).

I hope that you learn from my mistakes so that your business will grow!

AI Sales Coaching: How to Stop Rescuing Deals and Start Developing Salespeople

There is a dangerous moment in the growth of many B2B companies. It happens when the best salesperson becomes the sales manager.

The promotion seems obvious. This person consistently exceeds quota, understands customers, knows how to close difficult deals, and has earned the team’s respect. Who could be better qualified?

Six months later, that same person is personally rescuing the team’s largest opportunities, handling difficult customer objections, negotiating with executives, and keeping the forecast alive.

The company’s revenue looks healthy. The owner is satisfied. The sales manager appears indispensable.

And that is precisely the problem.

The company hasn’t developed a scalable sales organization. It has become dependent on one talented individual. Artificial intelligence offers an opportunity to change this pattern. But only if we rethink what sales management should accomplish.

The Difference Between Managing Deals and Developing Salespeople

Traditional sales management relies heavily on inspection and intervention. Managers review pipeline reports, examine forecasts, enforce activity requirements, and intervene when opportunities get into trouble. These activities are necessary, but they are not the same as coaching.

Consider a salesperson who confidently announces during a pipeline review that Mary is the Champion for a major opportunity. The manager suspects that Mary is simply a friendly contact who likes the product. An experienced manager might join the next customer meeting, take control of the conversation, and personally secure executive support. The opportunity might close. Unfortunately, the salesperson hasn’t developed the ability to identify and validate a real Champion.

A better manager asks a different question:

“What has Mary actually done that proves she is your Champion?”

Has Mary introduced the salesperson to important stakeholders? Has she explained the customer’s internal decision process? Has she advocated for the solution when the salesperson wasn’t present? Has she taken any personal risk to help the opportunity advance? If the salesperson cannot identify meaningful actions, the relationship remains an untested hypothesis.

The manager’s next responsibility isn’t to take over. It is to help the salesperson determine how to test that relationship. That coaching conversation improves the salesperson’s judgment, potentially affecting every future opportunity.

The objective of sales leadership is not to make the manager better at closing deals. It is to make the entire team better at closing deals.

Read the rest of the article…

AI Sales Automation: Why Your Chatbot Is Not a Sales Process

Imagine preparing for an important customer meeting. You open your favorite AI assistant, give it the prospect’s name, and ask for a summary of the company’s business challenges and the questions you should ask. Within seconds, you receive a beautifully written briefing. The assistant identifies potential operational problems, competitive pressures, and several opportunities to demonstrate the value of your solution.

There’s just one problem. One of those impressive insights concerns an acquisition the prospect supposedly completed last year.

Except the acquisition never happened.

The artificial intelligence fabricated a plausible business event and presented it as fact. Had you trusted the briefing, you might have opened your meeting with a question that immediately damaged your credibility.

This scenario illustrates a much larger problem with how B2B sales organizations use AI.

We’re asking artificial intelligence to perform too many different kinds of work without distinguishing which tasks require intelligence and which require reliable execution.

That distinction matters more than the sophistication of the AI model you choose.

The Problem Isn’t Just Hallucinations. It’s Process Design.

Salespeople increasingly rely on ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and other Generative AI applications to prepare for meetings, research prospects, write follow-up messages, and analyze opportunities. Those are legitimate applications of AI. In fact, I’d question why a salesperson with access to these capabilities wouldn’t use them. But consider what happens before the salesperson receives a useful answer.

They retrieve information from their CRM, gather previous meeting notes, identify stakeholders, check pricing, and reconstruct details from previous conversations. They paste everything into their AI assistant, ask a question, verify the response, and correct any mistakes.

Tomorrow, they repeat the process for another customer.

The AI may have improved the quality of their analysis, but the underlying sales process remains largely manual.

When twenty salespeople independently reconstruct the same process every day, you don’t have an AI adoption problem. You have a sales management problem.

You’re paying experienced professionals to repeatedly assemble information that your existing systems should already provide.

The solution isn’t necessarily better prompting. It’s better workflow design.

Read the rest of the article…

Stop Asking AI to Write: How Salespeople Can Use AI to Think Better

Most salespeople are using artificial intelligence too late in the sales process. They gather the account information. They interpret what matters. They decide what argument to make. They formulate the questions. They determine what the buyer probably cares about. Then, after doing all of the difficult thinking themselves, they hand the last 10% of the job to AI and say, “Write me an email.”

When the result sounds generic, they conclude AI isn’t particularly useful for serious B2B selling. The problem is not necessarily the technology. The problem is where they inserted it into the process.

A salesperson can get significantly more leverage from AI by using it before the answer is obvious. That means treating the system less like a copywriter and more like a junior analyst, researcher, sales coach, and thinking partner.

The Skill Is Not Prompt Writing

An entire industry is built around prompt libraries. “50 Best Prompts for Salespeople” sounds useful because it promises a shortcut. It also teaches the wrong lesson.

A prompt that worked for someone else’s account, market, buyer, sales process, and objective may be almost useless for yours. The more strategic the sales problem becomes, the less likely a canned prompt is to fit it.

The more durable skill is learning to decompose commercial work into reasoning steps.

A useful sequence is:

  • Context.
  • Objective.
  • Constraints.
  • Reasoning steps.
  • Output.
  • Critique.
  • Revision.

Instead of asking AI to jump from context directly to output, make it work through the intermediate decisions with you.

Suppose you are preparing for a meeting with a CFO. A weak request is:

“Write an email to the CFO.”

A stronger conversation begins by asking AI to identify the financial issues most likely to matter to that executive based on the evidence you provide. Then ask which conclusions are facts, which are inferences, and what additional information would increase confidence. Challenge the assumptions. Compare several possible value arguments. Only then should you ask for the email.

The writing is now the consequence of better thinking.

Read the rest of the article…

AI Prospecting Agents: Build More Pipeline Without Adding More SDRs

One of the more frustrating realities in modern sales is that a company can invest heavily in technology and still leave its best salespeople doing work that should never require their time.

The CRM is open. So is LinkedIn. There is an intent-data platform in another tab, a contact database in another, a sales engagement platform somewhere else, and perhaps a conversation intelligence tool running in the background.

The company has a technology stack. What it may not have is a prospecting system.

That distinction matters.

A collection of tools still depends on someone remembering which accounts matter, noticing when a former champion changes jobs, deciding which buying signals deserve attention, researching the account, moving information between systems, writing the message, and following up. When people are the integration layer connecting all those systems, the company has not really automated prospecting. It has simply given its salespeople more software to operate.

The Prospecting Advantage Has Changed

Traditional outbound sales was built around scarcity. Finding contact information, researching a company, and uncovering a credible reason to approach someone required significant effort. That made volume difficult and valuable.

Artificial intelligence changed those economics.

Today, generating another email is nearly free. Finding another prospect is relatively easy. AI can produce hundreds or thousands of messages faster than a sales team could ever review them. That does not make those messages valuable.

When volume becomes inexpensive, volume stops being a competitive advantage. Relevance becomes the scarce resource.

We need to evolve our systems away from asking, “How can we send more outreach?” Rather, we need to be thinking of, “How can we identify the people who deserve our attention right now and give our salespeople something useful to say when they contact them?”

A modern prospecting system therefore has to answer five questions continuously:

  1. Who should we pursue?
  2. Why should we pursue them now?
  3. What should we say?
  4. Which channel and timing gives us the best chance of engagement?
  5. When should a human salesperson enter the conversation?

The fifth question is particularly important.

Read the rest of the article…

Compelling Events: Shorten Sales Cycles & Improve Forecasts

Deals move when the buyer’s business calendar forces a decision.

A real compelling event is the operating discipline that separates pipeline from possibility. It gives urgency a business reason, attaches dates to consequences, and forces both sides to decide whether the opportunity deserves serious time, resources, and executive attention.

Many salespeople confuse need with urgency. That mistake creates bloated forecasts, stalled proposals, and too many “just checking in” follow-ups. A prospect can have a real need and still have no reason to act now. They may need

  • better integrations,
  • stronger reporting,
  • reduced churn,
  • tighter compliance,
  • faster workflows,
  • a cleaner technology stack.

Those needs matter, but they can live on a roadmap indefinitely.

A compelling event changes the conversation because something meaningful happens by a specific date.

  • An audit is scheduled.
  • A contract expires.
  • A board commitment has been made.
  • A market launch is tied to revenue.
  • A facility lease ends.
  • A regulatory requirement becomes enforceable.
  • A major customer is at risk.

These events create pressure because delays have consequences beyond the buying team’s preferences.

That is the standard. A compelling event has a date, an owner, and a consequence.

The Difference Between Interest and Commitment

Interest sounds productive in a sales conversation. Commitment behaves differently.

Interested buyers will schedule meetings, request demos, review capabilities, and discuss future-state improvements. Committed buyers will help you understand the decision path, expose internal constraints, validate timing, and clarify what happens if the outcome is missed.

The difference matters because your forecast depends on the customer’s decision reality, not your sales activity.

A compelling event gives you that reality. It tells you why the buyer is engaged now, who owns the risk, what business outcome must be protected, and which internal processes must be navigated to get there. Without that clarity, the opportunity may still be real, but it should be treated as unproven.

Sales leaders should inspect this with discipline. “They are excited” is not a compelling event. “Budget season” is not enough. “They want to modernize” is too soft. The better question is: what changed in their business that makes inaction costly?

That question protects your time and the buyer’s time.

Read the rest of the article…

The Dual Blueprint Requirement: Why Growth Demands Two Plans, Not One

Launching a company or steering one through a merger, turnaround, or major transition requires clarity about how value will be created and, just as importantly, how revenue will actually be generated.

Many leadership teams recognize the need for a Business Plan, but overlook that sustainable growth requires a second, complementary plan. The main breakdown is not the strategy itself, but the assumption that strategy automatically creates revenue. Bridging strategy and revenue requires a distinct plan for that conversion, targeting a different audience.

The Business Plan sets direction from the top down. The Sales Plan is validated by demonstrating how that direction can become actual revenue from the bottom up.

Both are essential. Neither works in isolation.

The Business Plan: Charting the Course (Top-Down)

The Business Plan exists to answer specific questions for a particular audience. Its primary readers are CEOs, CFOs, bankers, private equity partners, and venture investors. These stakeholders are evaluating risk, scale, and return. They want to know where the company is going and why the destination is worth the journey.

At its core, the Business Plan articulates strategic intent. It defines the mission, the long-term objectives, and the differentiated value proposition that the company believes the market will reward. It frames the opportunity in language that aligns leadership, capital, and governance.

Market analysis in this context is necessarily high-level. It focuses on the total addressable market, industry dynamics, competitive positioning, and macro trends. The goal is not to explain how every deal will be won, but to establish that a meaningful opportunity exists and that the company has a credible right to pursue it.

Financial projections follow the same logic. They are built on broad assumptions: projected market share, average selling price, renewal and retention rates, inflation, and multi-year revenue targets. These numbers are directional. They signal ambition and scale rather than operational certainty.

Read the rest of the article…

Hiring Your First Sales Leader? Build a Sales Machine, Not a Band-Aid

You are ready to hire your first sales leader when you are prepared to buy leverage, not relief. Titles do not grow revenue. A high-impact sales leader creates durable selling capability, reduces owner dependency, and raises standards through coaching, recruiting, and operating cadence. If what you really want is a second version of you to carry the number and keep deals moving, you are hiring a band-aid, and you will pay for it twice.

Most owners make this hire at precisely the wrong moment. The pressure is real, the pipeline feels fragile, and the business is starting to outgrow informal management. So the owner reaches for the obvious move: “We need a sales manager.” The problem is that the role is designed around short-term comfort rather than long-term capacity. The result is a well-paid administrative firefighter who inherits the chaos instead of fixing the system that creates it.

Before you post a job, clarify the objective. Do you want a revenue driver or a capability builder?

A revenue driver is a manager who helps you hit the number by conducting deal inspections, applying forecast pressure, and holding reps accountable. That can be valuable, but it is often a disguised need for personal production. A capability builder is a leader who creates repeatable performance by improving the quality of selling, tightening hiring standards, and building a coaching system that makes average reps better and good reps consistent. That is the role that changes enterprise value.

Here is the hard truth most owners avoid. If you design a role that combines selling and leading, selling will win. Always. When a leader has a quota, the business trains them to prioritize their own deals over the team’s development. They will “help” reps when a deal is in a late-stage, visible phase, then postpone coaching, recruiting, and onboarding because those activities do not pay this month. Over time, the team remains dependent, the pipeline remains uneven, and the owner remains in the middle.

Assessing readiness: leader or band aid

Readiness is not a revenue threshold. It is an operating decision. The question is whether you will let a sales leader lead.

The owner’s trap is hiring a leader while keeping day-to-day control: still running reviews, intervening in pricing, rewriting emails, jumping on calls, and closing important deals. In that environment, the new leader cannot build authority; they become an assistant with a title. You’ll be frustrated they’re “not taking enough off my plate,” while they’re frustrated at not being able to make decisions without you.

If you want a clean test, look for these warning signs:

  • You are still the primary deal closer and default problem solver.
  • You do not believe the company can make the number without your direct involvement.
  • You step into deals because you do not trust the process, the rep, or the forecast.
  • Your coaching is ad hoc, usually when something goes wrong.
  • Recruiting is episodic, triggered by pain, rather than continuous.
Read the rest of the article…

Stop Betting on Superstars: How Operating Standards Turn Sellers into Predictable Producers

Many teams grow, but few truly scale revenue beyond individual hero efforts. That difference changes everything for leaders today and in the future. Growth relies on hustle; scaling depends on repeatability across segments and individuals. Your strategy must reflect that hard truth in practice.

Are you relying on one standout to win deals month after month? That looks strong until risk turns visible and costly. One resignation can cripple momentum and expose brittle systems that you had previously ignored.

Scalable sales replaces heroics with defined, teachable operating rhythms that everyone follows. It turns chaos into predictable pipeline progress and results. It clarifies markets, messages, motions, and measurable expectations for every seller on a weekly basis. It builds leverage into onboarding and coaching for consistency. It protects margins while systematically accelerating win rates and velocity across territories.

The foundation begins with a clear picture of your ideal customer, including any disqualifying factors. Having an accurate Ideal Client Profile (ICP) helps minimize waste and reduce uncertainty in your efforts. Take time to define firmographics, pain points, triggers, and buying behaviors using consistent language based on shared evidence. Understand who cares about these issues and why it matters to them now. Also, identify negative personas to sharpen your focus and qualification processes in marketing and sales. A well-defined ICP can significantly boost your conversion rates and shorten the sales cycle.

Next, turn your ICP into straightforward messaging and discovery frameworks tailored for each stage. Consider what unique problems you solve for your customers. What outcomes are most important to them, and who are the key stakeholders by role and priority?

Build talk tracks that lead buyers, not chase buyers with purpose always. Anchor questions to the business metrics and risks they feel. Teach a qualification that tests mutual commitment and outlines next steps with attached dates. Avoid fluffy demos; design relevant proofs using their data. Process specificity turns B players into consistent producers without copying another personality.

I suggest you establish a practical, stage-based operating rhythm that everyone can easily understand and follow. By sharing clear definitions and expectations, managing the pipeline becomes a consistent and smooth process each week. Define each stage with specific exit criteria—avoiding vague intentions or subjective feelings. For example, discovery is considered complete when stakeholders confirm the consequences and impact, and solution fit is achieved when success criteria and ownership are clearly aligned. The commit stage should be backed by a shared plan with clear dates and assigned owners. During weekly reviews, focus on assessing quality rather than just quantity or activity counts. Ask yourself:

  • Does evidence from buyers’ backstage moves have a direct impact on their purchasing decisions?
  • Are the next steps specific, mutually agreed upon, and already scheduled on both calendars?
Read the rest of the article…