Business-to-business (B2B) sales is more than selling a product or service. It involves a strategic approach that includes understanding the customer’s needs, differentiating your offering, and building trust. This strategic approach is often called the three-legged stool of sales: Resonate, Differentiate, and Substantiate.
Resonating with customers is the first step (leg) in the sales process. It involves answering the questions “Why should the customer act?” and “Why should they act now?” To resonate with customers, you must understand their goals and how your product or service can meet them. This requires careful listening, understanding, and empathy.
The second leg of the stool is differentiation. This answers the question, “Why choose us?” Differentiation is all about highlighting what makes your product or service unique from the competition. This could be anything from superior quality and innovative features to excellent customer service. It’s crucial to communicate this differentiation clearly and effectively to the customer.
The success of any sales-driven organization in the business-to-business (B2B) space hinges on the sales team’s compensation plan. Over my four decades in B2B sales, I’ve observed that nothing influences the performance of sales personnel more directly than the design and implementation of their compensation plans. Compensation is not merely about rewarding sales achievements but crafting a strategy aligning individual salespeople’s goals with the company’s broader objectives.
A well-structured compensation plan acts as both a motivator and a guide. It compels sales teams not only to meet but exceed their targets, fostering an environment where continuous improvement is not just encouraged but becomes a natural byproduct of the system. For small business CEOs, understanding this dynamic is critical for sustaining and driving growth. Sales compensation is more than just a cost; it’s an investment in the company’s future.
In any sales environment, whether the market is brimming with potential or tightly contested, the compensation plan must be a living document that evolves in response to market conditions, company goals, and team performance. With this adaptability, companies can avoid stagnation or regression in their market positions. As businesses strive to scale and adapt, constructing a compensation plan that genuinely drives the right behaviors becomes all the more pertinent.
To delve deeper into this vital subject, CEOs should consider the immediate impacts of their compensation strategies and their long-term implications on sales culture and employee retention. For those ready to explore the intricacies of effective sales compensation and ensure their strategies are well-suited to their specific business contexts, I am here to lend my expertise. With extensive experience tailoring compensation plans to enhance sales productivity and company profitability, I invite you to reach out for further guidance on crafting a plan that meets and exceeds your strategic goals. You can set a time to talk to me using my link above Book Appointment With Sean.
The effectiveness of sales management is paramount, particularly in how sales managers support their team members to enhance performance. The nuanced relationship between a salesperson and their manager can significantly influence their success, a topic that is gaining traction among CEOs and sales leaders seeking to maximize their team’s capabilities.
One-on-one meetings between sales managers and salespeople are not just routine check-ins but pivotal moments that can define a sales team’s success trajectory. These interactions are opportunities for sales managers to transition from merely overseeing to actively fostering the growth of future sales leaders. The effectiveness of these meetings hinges on the preparation and the approach both parties bring to the table.
A key aspect of these meetings is the focus on the sales pipeline. These are not annual reviews but regular, detailed discussions that provide immediate, actionable feedback. The format of these meetings should allow salespeople to lead the conversation, highlighting challenges and insights into their deals. By doing so, they take ownership of their responsibilities and develop critical analytical skills. It’s crucial for salespeople to come prepared, not with just a superficial overview but with a deep dive into their accounts, ready to discuss specifics such as potential roadblocks in deal closures and strategies for advancing stages in the sales pipeline.
Micromanagement can be a pitfall in these scenarios. While it may be tempting for managers to steer conversations, especially with less experienced salespeople, it’s essential to restrain this impulse. The goal is to guide salespeople to independently spot issues and develop solutions, fostering a more robust and self-reliant sales force.
Integrating technology, such as CRM systems, plays a crucial role. The sales leader and salesperson must thoroughly review all relevant data before meetings. This preparation prevents redundancy during discussions and ensures that the focus is on strategizing rather than information regurgitation. Such meticulousness shows respect for each other’s time and reinforces the value of each meeting.
Training salespeople to identify potential issues streamlines the sales process and prepares them to handle complexities in future deals. This approach enhances their problem-solving skills and aligns with broader business objectives, contributing to the company’s overall health and success.
The transformation of routine management into strategic mentorship can significantly impact a sales team’s effectiveness. Sales leaders must foster an environment where salespeople are empowered to analyze and lead discussions about their work, making these one-on-one meetings a cornerstone of a thriving sales culture. By doing so, they not only improve the immediate outcomes of their deals but also build a resilient and forward-thinking sales team.
Immediate Steps for Sales Leaders to Elevate Their Team’s Performance
Schedule Regular One-on-One Meetings: Set a consistent schedule for one-on-one pipeline review meetings with each salesperson. These should be frequent enough to provide real-time feedback and support, ideally weekly or bi-weekly.
Prepare Thoroughly for Each Meeting: Review the salesperson’s current pipeline and deal statuses in the CRM before each meeting. This preparation allows you to provide targeted advice and focus on strategic discussions rather than information recap.
Empower Salespeople to Lead Discussions: Encourage sales representatives to prepare and lead the meetings. Provide a structure for these sessions but allow them to fill in the details and drive the agenda. This approach helps develop their analytical and leadership skills.
Focus on Professional Development Goals: Be prepared to discuss sales targets and strategies during these meetings. You should identify and plan for each salesperson’s professional development and tailor coaching and feedback to help them grow into future sales leaders.
Welcome to another insightful episode of “Two Tall Guys Talking Sales,” where we continue our vibrant discussion this week with special guest Tom Morgan, a former collegiate basketball coach turned sales strategy guru. Diving into the parallels between sports coaching and sales management, this episode is packed with strategic insights to enhance your sales team’s performance as the quarter and year draw to a close.
Key Topics Discussed:
The Importance of Early and Ongoing Preparation: Starting strong from the beginning of the year or season sets teams up for success.
Fundamentals in Sports and Sales: A comparison of essential practices like the three-man weave in basketball to fundamental sales activities such as prospecting and client interaction.
Role of Support Players in Success: Discuss how each team member’s effective execution of their role enhances overall performance.
Impact of Precision and Timing: The critical nature of precise actions and decisions in the closing moments of a game or sales quarter.
Role Clarity and Consistent Language in Sales Teams: How clear definitions and consistent communication within teams can streamline processes and improve outcomes.
Creative and Effective Role-Playing: Innovative approaches to role-playing that increase engagement and effectiveness in training sessions.
Key Quotes:
Kevin Lawson: “Doing the easy things well translates into doing the hard things more effectively.”
Sean O’Shaughnessey: “The ability to do it over and over again, make mistakes in practice so that I didn’t make that same mistake in the game.”
Tom Morgan: “It’s those fundamentals… You start to practice those key details. As you get into your sales process, those are the things when you get to the end of a quarter, you’re relying on best practices.”
Summary:
Whether you’re a sales novice or a seasoned leader, this episode offers invaluable lessons on preparation, practice, and execution that are crucial for any high-stakes environment, not just in sales or sports. Tom Morgan’s expertise in translating athletic coaching techniques into sales strategies provides listeners practical tools and thoughtful strategies to elevate their teams’ performance. Tune in to harness these techniques and ensure your team is ready and fundamentally conditioned for success at the quarter’s end. Don’t miss out on this game-changing discussion—perfect for anyone looking to enhance their strategic approach to sales management.
Territory design is critical for ensuring efficient revenue generation and optimal team performance. Sales leaders, especially those at the helm of small—to mid-sized companies, must revisit and potentially recalibrate their territory strategies to accommodate growth and maintain competitiveness.
Effective territory management starts with a clear understanding of the business landscape. Ensuring that each salesperson has a viable area with ample opportunity is crucial. This may sound straightforward but involves a delicate balance of geographic and customer-based considerations. For instance, some businesses might operate on a model where territories are defined by customer types or specific named accounts, which could include focusing on a set number of businesses to target. On the other hand, more geographically expansive businesses might allocate territories based on regions, such as counties or states, depending on their size and scope.
Moreover, there’s an art to knowing when and how to split or expand territories without diluting the quality of customer relationships or the sales team’s morale. For example, if a territory becomes too large and unwieldy, it might necessitate division to maintain or increase effectiveness. However, this division must be approached with sensitivity and strategy, ensuring it does not merely become a means to reduce commission costs but rather a method to enhance coverage and customer engagement.
The challenge often lies in the execution. Realigning territories can be as complex as managing a new product launch or entering a new market. Factors such as supply chain logistics, warranty services, and resource allocation must all be considered to ensure the new territory design supports immediate sales goals and long-term business growth.
Sales leaders must also be adept at navigating the internal dynamics of territory adjustments. For instance, a well-performing salesperson might view the reduction of their territory as a punitive measure, rather than an opportunity to enhance focus and potentially increase earnings from a more concentrated area. It is crucial for management to communicate effectively, ensuring that the team understands these changes are aimed at optimizing the entire sales process and enhancing their ability to meet customer needs more effectively.
Ultimately, the goal of territory design should align with the overarching business strategy aimed at growth and sustainability. This includes not only deciding the physical or conceptual boundaries of each territory but also ensuring that each sales team member is positioned to succeed, supported by robust training and resources, and motivated by a clear understanding of their role in the company’s broader objectives.
As companies prepare for another business cycle, revisiting the principles of effective territory management could be the key to unlocking new levels of success and stability. This strategic approach helps maintain a competitive edge and supports a healthy, dynamic sales culture that adapts to the changing landscapes of industries and markets.
Actionable suggestions that sales managers can do today:
Conduct a Territory Audit: Review your current sales territories by evaluating sales data, customer distribution, and team feedback. Identify areas where territories may be too large or too small and assess the potential for restructuring to improve coverage and salesperson efficiency. This will help you understand if your current design aligns with optimal market coverage and team capabilities.
Initiate a Team Discussion: Meet your sales team to discuss the current territory alignment. Use this opportunity to gather insights directly from those on the ground about their territories’ challenges and opportunities. This feedback is invaluable for making informed decisions about potential territory realignments or adjustments to meet customer needs and company goals.
Navigating the complexities and ensuring a robust and productive team are pivotal to achieving sustained success in sales. Accountability within a sales team requires pinpointing underperformance and creating an environment where feedback is constructive and growth is nurtured. The notion that no team member should be surprised by a change in their employment status underscores the importance of transparent communication. Setting realistic expectations and having regular discussions ensures that salespeople know where they stand and what is expected of them.
Underperformance can stem from various factors, but a common issue highlighted is the lack of skills. Identifying this gap is the first step toward rectification, paving the way for targeted coaching and development. Coaching isn’t just about improving skills; it’s about instilling the right behaviors that drive success. This is particularly crucial in small businesses where the owners might juggle multiple roles, potentially overlooking critical aspects of their operations, including sales.
The dialogue also touches upon the importance of diversifying strategies beyond a single mode of customer engagement. For instance, relying solely on email without integrating calls can limit a salesperson’s effectiveness. Similarly, focusing too intensely on a single key account to the detriment of prospecting new clients can jeopardize overall sales performance.
Sales managers play a crucial role in facilitating the development of their team members, not only by setting expectations but also by actively participating in joint sales calls and understanding the challenges their salespeople face. Unfortunately, many sales managers haven’t engaged in such activities with their team members in years, highlighting a gap in leadership engagement that can contribute to underperformance.
Peer accountability, celebrating small wins, and fostering a culture where successes are recognized and rewarded contribute significantly to a healthy sales environment. These practices motivate salespeople and help to identify those struggling, offering them the support needed to improve. It’s a collective effort, emphasizing that sales is not just about individual achievements but about lifting the entire team, reflecting the adage that a rising tide lifts all boats.
Therefore, Addressing underperformance is not just about identifying weaknesses but creating an ecosystem where salespeople are supported, skilled, and motivated to excel. It involves a comprehensive approach, from ensuring adequate training and development to fostering a culture of accountability and support.
For sales managers and CEOs, the key takeaway is the importance of being actively involved in their team’s development, understanding their challenges, and providing the resources and support necessary for success. Sales is a complex and demanding field, but with the right strategies and a supportive environment, outstanding results are possible.
Actionable items that you can use today!
Evaluate Communication and Expectations: Initiate a comprehensive review of your current communication practices and the clarity of expectations within your sales team. Ensure that every member clearly understands their goals, the metrics by which they are evaluated, and the consequences of underperformance. This could involve revising job descriptions, performance metrics, or the regularity and format of feedback sessions.
Implement a Peer Accountability System: Start the process of establishing a peer accountability system by organizing a team meeting to discuss its benefits. Encourage your sales team to share their successes and challenges openly, and pair team members to serve as accountability partners. This system should aim to foster a supportive environment where salespeople can learn from each other and motivate one another toward achieving their sales targets.
Develop a Mini-Coaching Plan: Identify at least one salesperson on your team who may be struggling or showing signs of underperformance. Design a short, targeted coaching plan to address their specific challenges, whether they be skill-based or motivational. This plan could include shadowing a high-performing team member, attending a specific training session, or setting up regular coaching meetings to work on identified areas of improvement.
The challenge of aligning the right people with the right organizational roles is paramount. As sales leaders and CEOs of small companies, understanding the intricacies of building and maintaining a proficient sales team is crucial for driving growth and achieving success.
The concept of having the “right people in the right seats” is not just a matter of recruitment but an ongoing process of evaluation, development, and strategic alignment. It’s essential to recognize that the adequacy of a sales team is not solely dependent on individual capabilities but also on how these individuals fit within the broader sales strategy and organizational culture.
Compensation plans, customer relationship management (CRM) systems, and the overarching sales infrastructure play significant roles in enabling sales teams to perform at their best. However, the foundation of a high-performing sales team lies in the continuous investment in people. This involves identifying talent and fostering an environment that promotes learning, growth, and adaptation.
Training and development are often overlooked aspects of sales management. Surprisingly, a significant number of sales professionals and leaders go years without receiving formal training. This gap in skill development can lead to stagnation and inefficiency. Therefore, organizations must prioritize ongoing education and training to keep their sales teams agile and competitive.
Furthermore, it is critical that individual roles align with the organization’s goals. This may involve reevaluating existing roles, responsibilities, and processes to ensure they contribute effectively to the sales strategy. Sometimes, the solution does not lie in hiring new talent but in optimizing the current team’s structure and roles to leverage their strengths more effectively.
Performance improvement plans (PIPs) and the concept of “top-grading” the sales team highlight the importance of accountability and continuous improvement. While PIPs can be a tool for addressing performance issues, they should not be the first resort. Instead, leaders should focus on setting clear expectations, providing the necessary resources and support, and fostering a culture of excellence.
Sometimes, the issue may not be with the sales personnel but with the systems, processes, or even the leadership approach. Before making drastic decisions, such as replacing team members, it’s worth taking a step back to assess whether the organization provides the right environment, tools, and guidance for the team to succeed.
Ultimately, building and managing an effective sales team is an intricate process that requires a balanced approach. It involves ensuring that you have the right people in place and that these individuals are equipped, motivated, and aligned with the organization’s goals. As sales leaders and managers, it’s essential to identify and address gaps, foster a culture of continuous learning and improvement, and strategically align team structures and processes to drive sales performance.
For salespeople, sales managers, and CEOs of small companies, understanding these dynamics and adopting a holistic approach to sales management can significantly enhance their team’s effectiveness and their organization’s ability to achieve its sales objectives.
Actionable items that you can do today
Evaluate Your Team’s Composition: Take a moment to assess the current structure of your sales team. Identify whether each member is in the role that best suits their skills and where they can contribute the most to the team’s objectives. This could involve one-on-one discussions to understand their goals, strengths, and areas for improvement.
Initiate a Training Needs Analysis: Conduct a thorough training needs analysis to identify gaps in skills and knowledge within your sales team. This should cover everything from product knowledge to sales techniques and the use of CRM systems. Based on this analysis, outline a tailored training program to address these gaps and elevate your team’s performance.
Review and Adjust Compensation Plans: Analyze your current compensation and incentive structures to ensure they align with your organizational goals and sales targets. Adjustments might be necessary to better motivate your team and encourage the behaviors and outcomes you wish to see. This could mean introducing new performance bonuses, adjusting commission rates, or implementing non-monetary rewards that drive motivation.
Implement a Sales Enablement Strategy: Start developing or refining your sales enablement strategy to ensure your sales team has the tools, resources, and content they need to succeed. This could involve updating sales playbooks, improving CRM processes, or investing in new sales enablement technology. The goal is to make it easier for your sales team to sell effectively and efficiently.
Few topics in sales stir as much discussion and attention as compensation plans. The proper compensation structure can ignite a team’s performance, attract top talent, and drive a company toward its strategic goals. Conversely, a poorly conceived plan can lead to demotivation, high turnover, and missed targets. This discussion delves into the intricacies of designing compensation plans that motivate and align with a company’s broader objectives, offering insights for salespeople, sales managers, and CEOs alike.
Compensation in sales is not just about rewarding past successes; it’s a strategic tool that shapes future behavior. The fundamental premise is straightforward: sales professionals are motivated by earnings potential. Yet, applying this premise within compensation plans can be complex, nuanced, and sometimes contentious. It’s essential to balance base salary and variable compensation, ensuring sales representatives are adequately supported and incentivized to pursue new business aggressively.
The debate between 100% commission versus a guaranteed salary represents the spectrum of risk and reward in sales compensation. On one end, a 100% commission plan offers unlimited earning potential but lacks security, potentially leading to a high-stress culture and a short-term focus. It also makes it much more difficult to recruit younger sales superstars who may not have the financial security to afford a 100% commission compensation plan. Conversely, a guaranteed salary provides stability but might dampen the urgency and hunger that drive sales excellence. The consensus among seasoned sales leaders points to a balanced approach, often epitomized by a 50/50 split between base salary and variable compensation. This structure aims to provide a safety net while ensuring sales efforts directly impact earnings.
Understanding the market potential within a sales representative’s territory is critical when setting quotas and compensation. For larger teams, the ability to average performance across the group can help smooth out individual variances. However, in smaller teams or founder-led sales organizations, each member’s contribution is magnified, demanding a more nuanced approach to quota setting. Regardless of team size, aligning individual quotas with company objectives requires a blend of data analysis, market insight, and an appreciation for each territory’s unique challenges and opportunities.
Beyond the structure of compensation plans, the timing and criteria for payouts are pivotal. Monthly payouts can incentivize immediate results and help maintain momentum, whereas quarterly payouts may lead to strategic deal timing but can also introduce cash flow challenges for sales professionals. Moreover, compensation plans should evolve in tandem with a company’s strategic goals, ensuring that sales efforts are aligned with the organization’s overarching priorities.
Crafting effective sales compensation plans is both an art and a science. It demands a deep understanding of human motivation, a clear vision of company objectives, and a commitment to fairness and transparency. By carefully designing compensation structures that reward performance, foster team collaboration, and support long-term strategic goals, companies can create a sales culture that not only meets targets but exceeds them, driving growth and success in the competitive world of B2B sales.
Immediate Action Item 1: Evaluate and Adjust Your Compensation Structure
Assessment of Current Plans: Begin by thoroughly assessing your current sales compensation plan. This involves evaluating how well the existing structure supports your company’s strategic goals and motivates your sales team. Are your sales representatives meeting their targets? Do they feel motivated and supported? These questions can uncover valuable insights into the effectiveness of your compensation plan.
Balanced Compensation Review: Reflect on the balance between your organization’s base salary and variable compensation. Does it align with the 50/50 split recommended by seasoned sales leaders? If not, consider adjusting this balance to provide both security and incentive to your sales team. This balance is crucial for motivating your team while ensuring they are adequately supported.
Action Steps:
Survey your sales team to gather feedback on the current compensation plan.
Analyze sales performance data to identify patterns or areas for improvement.
Consult with HR or compensation specialists to explore potential adjustments.
Implement a pilot program for a new compensation structure in a small team or region to measure its impact before a company-wide rollout.
Immediate Action Item 2: Align Compensation with Strategic Goals and Territory Potential
Quota Setting and Territory Analysis: It’s essential to align individual quotas with the sales territory’s potential and the overarching company objectives. This alignment ensures that sales efforts are directed towards strategic goals, optimizing both individual and team performance.
Compensation Plan Evolution: Regularly review and update your compensation plans to align with your company’s strategic goals. This might mean adjusting the payout criteria, the balance between base and variable compensation, or the targets set for sales representatives.
Action Steps:
Conduct a territory analysis to ensure realistic quotas align with market potential.
Set up a quarterly review process for the compensation plan to ensure it remains aligned with company objectives and market conditions.
Engage sales managers in discussions about territory potential and strategic goals to ensure their input is considered in compensation planning.
Communicate changes in compensation plans clearly and effectively to the entire sales team, ensuring they understand how these changes benefit both them and the company.
Implementing these action items can lead to a more motivated sales team, better alignment with strategic goals, and improved sales performance. Remember, the key to successful sales compensation is not just in the design but in the ongoing evaluation and adjustment to meet the evolving needs of both your sales team and your company.
I regularly talk to my clients who have long and complicated sales processes regarding the need to adopt a Decision Timeline. These are known by many different names, but regardless of name, they are a list of action items that both companies need to check off either independently or mutually. This allows both the selling and buying teams to have a project plan to arrive at a decision to move forward with a financial transaction in return for the product or service.
When a selling team first does a Decision Timeline, it is not unusual for it to be very similar to a Close Plan, but the goal is to have mutually agreed-upon outcomes. My friends at Sales Assembly put out a great video to drive home the correct behavior, and it is worth every salesperson’s time to review it.
In business-to-business sales, extending discounts holds a place of ancient reverence, a tactic as old as commerce itself. This approach, crafted to escalate sales volume, capitalizes on a fundamental business purchasing principle: the quest for cost efficiency. By lowering the prices of goods or services, firms aspire to enhance the desirability of their products, thereby aiming to boost demand and, consequently, sales volume. Employing this tactic becomes particularly compelling in scenarios such as launching a new product line during contract renewal phases or seeking to penetrate deeper into highly competitive markets. The underlying premise is straightforward: reduced prices are anticipated to drive up sales volumes, potentially offsetting the dip in margins per unit sold.
However, offering a prospect a discount warrants careful consideration. While the immediate benefits—spiked interest from potential clients, an uptick in sales volumes, and the rapid inventory turnover—might seem enticing, the broader implications unveil a complex set of ramifications. This article endeavors to peel away the layers enveloping this widespread sales strategy, illuminating its influence on profitability, and evaluating its sustainability as a long-term practice.
Navigating the Complexity of Discounting in B2B Sales
At initial consideration, discounts present an ostensibly harmonious scenario: clients secure the products or services they need at reduced rates, while companies witness a boost in sales activity. Nevertheless, the stark reality is that indiscriminate discounting can significantly undermine profitability. This necessitates a nuanced understanding of profitability metrics: gross profit versus net profit.
In professional business-to-business sales, the sales team doesn’t need a CPA, but they should know the basics of finance. Understanding the interplay between Gross Profit, Net Profit, COGS (Cost of Goods Sold), and SG&A (Selling, General & Administrative Expenses) is pivotal for any organization aiming to fine-tune its operational efficiency and profitability. These metrics, each distinct in scope and impact, collectively offer a comprehensive view of a company’s financial health. Let’s delve into these concepts, exploring their nuances and significance in the broader context of business management.
COGS: The Direct Costs Tied to Production
COGS encompasses the direct costs attributable to the production of the goods or services sold by a company. This includes raw materials, labor costs directly involved in production, and manufacturing overheads. COGS is a critical metric for management to consider, as it directly affects the Gross Profit. By optimizing production processes or negotiating better terms with suppliers, a company can effectively lower its COGS, thereby increasing its Gross Profit margin—an essential strategy for enhancing profitability.
SG&A: The Overhead of Running a Business
SG&A represents the cumulative expenses incurred from selling, general, and administrative activities. These are the costs associated with operating the business that are not directly tied to production, including sales force salaries, marketing expenses, rent, utilities, and administrative salaries. SG&A expenses are significant because they do not directly contribute to producing goods or services; they are essential for the company’s day-to-day operations and strategic positioning in the market. Effective management of SG&A expenses can significantly influence a company’s Net Profit, as these costs can either erode or support profitability depending on how they are controlled.
Gross Profit: The Initial Gauge of Profitability
Gross Profit is the initial measure of a company’s financial performance, calculated by subtracting the Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) from the total revenue generated from sales. This figure is crucial because it reflects the efficiency with which a company produces or sources its goods and services before accounting for broader operational costs. For instance, if a company generates $1 million in sales and incurs $600,000 in COGS, its Gross Profit would be $400,000. This metric indicates the company’s production or procurement efficiency but does not account for the overheads and other operating expenses that also impact the company’s profitability.
Net Profit: The Ultimate Measure of Financial Health
Net Profit, often considered the bottom line, is the ultimate indicator of a company’s profitability after all expenses, including COGS, SG&A, interest, and taxes, have been deducted from total revenue. It is the most comprehensive measure of a company’s financial performance, revealing what remains as actual profit. For example, continuing from the Gross Profit scenario, if the company has additional operating expenses of $200,000 and taxes and interest amounting to $50,000, the Net Profit would be $150,000. This figure is paramount for stakeholders to assess the company’s profitability and sustainability.
Gross profit, calculated as the revenue from sales minus the cost of goods sold (COGS), provides an initial insight into the financial gain from sales. Yet, the net profit, the remainder after deducting all operational expenditures, interest, taxes, and Selling, General & Administrative (SGA) expenses from the gross profit, genuinely encapsulates a company’s financial health.
How All Of This Applies to Salespeople
In most companies, the sales team cannot change the COGS or SG&A for any deal. The only thing salespeople can typically control is the Selling Price; from that Selling Price, the costs have to be deducted to calculate the Net Profit.
Let’s dissect the financial dynamics further. Assume a service in the B2B sector is offered at a standard rate of $100,000, with a COGS of $60,000, rendering a gross profit of $40,000—a 40% gross margin. With the 20% SGA and other operational costs factored in, the net profit might settle at $20,000 per sale, constituting a 20% net margin on the transaction.
Assuming the costs in the company are static, introducing a 10% discount drops the service price to $90,000. While the gross profit shrinks to $30,000 after we take out the $60,000 in COGS, the net profit is disproportionately affected. The fixed nature of SGA expenses means they remain constant, dramatically squeezing the net margin. In this example, the net profit after the 10% discount drops from $20,000 to $10,000.
Let’s summarize this example without all of the wording:
0% Discount
5% Discount
10% Discount
List Price
$100,000
$100,000
$100,000
Selling Price
$100.000
$95,000
$90,000
COGS
$60,000
$60,000
$60,000
Gross Profit
$40,000
$35,000
$30,000
SG&A
$20,000
$20,000
$20,000
Net Profit
$20,000
$15,000
$10,000
As you can see from the above table, a 5% discount means a 25% reduction in Net Profit for this hypothetical company. A 10% discount means a 50% discount in Net Profit.
The critical question then becomes: How much additional sales volume is necessary to maintain or increase overall profitability post-discount? The revelation often shocks: a minor discount demands a significant upsurge in sales volume to compensate for the reduced net profitability—a challenging feat in the B2B landscape, where sales cycles are longer and client acquisition efforts more intensive.
Let’s show that math more clearly with the above example. Let’s assume that the above company only sells products with a $100,000 list price and they do 100 deals in a year. That means if all of the deals are at least price, they will achieve a gross revenue of $10,000,000 and a net profit of $2,000,000.
However, if the company gives everyone a 5% discount and the company’s stockholders want the same net profit, they will have to do $2M divided by $15K deals. That is 134 deals or a 34% increase in the number of deals. This means that a 5% discount means the sales team has to close 34% more deals to contribute the same net profit to the shareholders.
If the company gives everyone a 10% discount and the company’s stockholders want the same net profit, they will have to do $2M divided by $10K deals. That is 200 deals or a 100% increase in the number of deals. This means that a 10% discount means the sales team has to close twice the number of deals to contribute the same amount of net profit to the shareholders.
Reassessing the Discount Strategy
The appeal of leveraging discounts to amplify sales volume in the B2B sector is undeniable but fraught with pitfalls. Such strategies can erode net profitability, necessitate unrealistic sales volume increases to maintain financial stability, and might inadvertently signal desperation or devalue the proposition in the eyes of business clients. The purpose of this article is not to outright condemn discounting but to advocate for a strategic application thereof. Companies should meticulously evaluate the immediate allure of increased sales against the enduring implications for profitability. In numerous instances, alternative strategies that add value or enhance service offerings may present a more viable route to growth and financial robustness.
The Commission Conundrum: Revenue vs. Profitability
In the intricate ecosystem of sales and profitability, a critical and often overlooked element is the structure of sales commissions. The traditional commission model incentivizes sales personnel—and, by extension, their managers—based on the volume or dollar value of sales achieved, not the profitability of those sales to the company. This misalignment between the sales force’s motivations and the company’s overarching financial goals can lead to a significant disconnect, particularly in the context of discounting strategies.
As a lever of motivation, sales commissions are designed to spur sales teams to higher performance levels. However, when commissions are tied solely to revenue without consideration for profitability, it encourages a focus on the top line at the expense of the bottom line. For instance, a salesperson might be driven to close deals by offering discounts, thereby boosting their sales figures—and, by extension, their commissions—even if such discounts erode the company’s net profit. This scenario is further compounded if the salesperson’s manager, who also benefits from the team’s revenue performance, supports such discount-driven sales tactics without regard to their impact on profitability.
This model creates a fundamental misalignment between the sales team’s goals and top management’s strategic objectives. While sales teams are propelled towards maximizing raw revenue, top management’s primary concern is enhancing net profit—the company’s financial health indicator. The crux of the problem lies in the fact that discounts, while potentially beneficial for achieving short-term sales targets, can significantly undermine net profit margins. This is particularly true in industries where the cost structure is fixed or semi-fixed, and reducing prices does not proportionately decrease costs.
Implementing Safeguards: Aligning Sales Strategies with Profitability Goals
The solution to this problem lies in implementing robust safeguards and a strategic overhaul of the commission structure. First, establishing a rigorous discount approval process can be an effective checkpoint. This process ensures that discounts align with broader financial strategies and the company’s profitability goals. Such a system might include tiered discount limits, beyond which sales personnel must obtain managerial or executive approval.
Second, reconfiguring the commission model to incorporate profitability metrics can realign the incentives for the sales team with the company’s financial objectives. This might involve setting commissions based on net profit generated by sales rather than gross revenue. Alternatively, a balanced scorecard approach, with MBO goals (Management By Objective), including revenue and profitability targets, can incentivize sales personnel to consider the broader financial implications of their sales tactics.
Bridging the Gap Between Sales and Profitability
The alignment of sales strategies with the company’s profitability objectives is not merely a financial imperative but a strategic necessity. By reevaluating commission structures and implementing safeguards against indiscriminate discounting, companies can ensure that their sales efforts contribute positively to the bottom line. This approach fosters a culture where the sales team is not just focused on meeting revenue targets but is also mindful of the profitability and financial health of the organization. In doing so, companies can bridge the gap between pursuing raw revenue and the imperative of net profit, ensuring long-term sustainability and growth. This strategic alignment is crucial for navigating the complex interplay between sales incentives and company profitability, ultimately leading to a more cohesive and financially robust business model.
The delicate balance between pursuing immediate revenue gains through discounts and maintaining the integrity of net profitability demands a strategic reevaluation. The allure of discounts, often seen as a shortcut to achieving sales targets, undeniably poses a significant challenge to profitability. However, the proper resolution lies not in the mere restriction of discounts but in the fundamental shift towards selling value, cultivating champions within client organizations, and ensuring a seamless product alignment with the customer’s needs and objectives. This comprehensive approach mitigates the adverse effects of discounting on profitability and fortifies the foundation for sustainable, value-driven sales practices.
Selling Value: Elevating the Conversation Beyond Price
The cornerstone of mitigating the need for discounts is effectively articulating and demonstrating value. Value selling transcends the simplistic equation of cost versus features, delving into the tangible and intangible benefits that the product or service brings to the customer. This involves a meticulous understanding of the customer’s business landscape, challenges, and strategic objectives. By positioning the product or service as a pivotal solution that addresses these elements, sales professionals can pivot the conversation from price to value, emphasizing the return on investment (ROI) and the broader impact on the customer’s business.
The art of selling value requires a systematic approach, blending analytical rigor with a deep empathy for the customer’s context. It involves crafting a narrative that resonates with the customer’s aspirations and needs, backed by concrete data and case studies that illustrate the positive outcomes achieved by similar clients. This strategy elevates the customer’s perception of the product and fosters a more profound, consultative relationship that is less susceptible to the commoditization pressures that drive discounting.
Building Champions: The Power of Internal Advocacy
Another pivotal strategy is the cultivation of champions within the customer’s organization. Champions are internal advocates who understand and believe in the product or service’s value and are willing to mobilize support for it within their organization. Building champions involves identifying potential advocates based on their influence, alignment with the product’s value proposition, and professional objectives.
Empowering these champions requires providing them with the knowledge, tools, and confidence to articulate the value proposition internally effectively. This includes tailored presentations, compelling case studies, and data-driven ROI analyses that they can use to persuade other stakeholders. Champions serve as a critical bridge, amplifying the sales message and facilitating a deeper engagement with the customer organization. They help navigate internal dynamics and objections, making the sales process more efficient and reducing the reliance on discounts as a persuasive tool.
Aligning Product to Customer’s Needs and Goals: The Keystone of Value
At the heart of the solution to discount-driven sales challenges lies the alignment of the product or service with the customer’s needs and goals. This alignment ensures that the offering is not just a generic solution but a strategic fit that addresses specific challenges and capitalizes on unique opportunities within the customer’s business. Achieving this alignment requires a consultative sales approach characterized by active listening, probing questions, and a collaborative exploration of the customer’s business environment.
This process involves understanding the current needs and anticipating future challenges and opportunities. The sales professional must adopt a strategic advisor role, leveraging insights and expertise to guide the customer toward solutions that meet immediate needs and support long-term objectives. This level of alignment fosters a partnership-based relationship, where the product or service’s value is inherently recognized, reducing the customer’s sensitivity to price and diminishing the need for discounts.
A Strategic Blueprint for Sustainable Sales Success
The challenges posed by discounting strategies to profitability are significant but manageable. The proper solution lies in a holistic approach that focuses on selling value, building champions, and ensuring a deep alignment between the product and the customer’s needs and goals. This strategy requires a shift from transactional sales tactics to a more consultative and value-driven sales methodology.
By effectively selling value, sales professionals can elevate the conversation beyond price, emphasizing the broader business impact and ROI of their offering. Building champions within customer organizations create powerful allies who can advocate for the product internally, leveraging their influence to support the sales process. Finally, ensuring that the product is closely aligned with the customer’s strategic needs and goals solidifies the foundation for a partnership-based relationship, where the inherent value of the solution diminishes the focus on price and negates the need for discounts.
This approach addresses the immediate challenge of maintaining profitability in the face of discount pressures and lays the groundwork for sustainable sales success. It fosters more profound and more meaningful customer relationships built on a foundation of trust, value, and strategic alignment. In doing so, it positions companies to achieve short-term sales targets and long-term business objectives, securing a competitive advantage in the complex landscape of B2B sales.
Actions That You Can Take Today
To address the challenge of discounts affecting profitability without altering COGS or SG&A costs, sales managers and CEOs can implement the following five actionable steps today to enhance their company’s profitability through strategic sales practices:
Reframe the Sales Conversation Around Value, Not Price: Train your sales team to pivot discussions with clients from price to the comprehensive value your product or service offers. This involves deepening their understanding of the client’s business needs and how your solutions can address these needs in a way that contributes positively to the client’s profitability and operational efficiency. Encourage your team to prepare case studies and ROI analyses that clearly articulate the long-term benefits and cost savings of choosing your product or service over cheaper alternatives.
Introduce a Value-based Commission Structure: Redesign the commission structure to reward sales personnel not just for gross revenue, but also for selling at or near list price, thereby preserving or enhancing profitability. This could include bonuses for deals closed without discounts or additional incentives for upselling value-adding features or services that improve customer outcomes without significantly increasing discount levels.
Establish Strict Discount Approval Processes: Implement a tiered approval process for discounts requiring higher management levels to sign off on larger discounts. This process should include a profitability analysis to ensure that any discounts granted do not erode the net profit margin below an acceptable threshold. Making the discounting process more rigorous will encourage sales teams to seek alternative strategies to close deals.
Cultivate and Empower Internal Champions: Develop a program to identify and nurture champions within your prospects—key individuals who understand and believe in the value of your solutions. Provide these champions with the tools and information they need to advocate effectively on your behalf, turning them into an extension of your sales team. This might include exclusive insights into product development, customized value assessments, or early access to new features or services.
Align Sales Goals with Strategic Business Objectives: Ensure that your sales team’s objectives align with the company’s broader strategic goals, particularly profitability. This might involve setting specific targets for selling certain products or services with higher profit margins or developing bundled offerings that meet customer needs more comprehensively while improving profitability. Regularly review these goals and the strategies employed to achieve them, adjusting as necessary to keep your sales efforts focused on enhancing the bottom line.
By implementing these strategies, sales managers and CEOs can drive their teams towards practices that maintain and potentially increase profitability, even when discounts are off the table. These action items foster a culture of value selling, strategic negotiation, and customer-centric solutions, ultimately contributing to sustainable growth and profitability.
