Few topics in sales stir as much discussion and attention as compensation plans. The proper compensation structure can ignite a team’s performance, attract top talent, and drive a company toward its strategic goals. Conversely, a poorly conceived plan can lead to demotivation, high turnover, and missed targets. This discussion delves into the intricacies of designing compensation plans that motivate and align with a company’s broader objectives, offering insights for salespeople, sales managers, and CEOs alike.
Compensation in sales is not just about rewarding past successes; it’s a strategic tool that shapes future behavior. The fundamental premise is straightforward: sales professionals are motivated by earnings potential. Yet, applying this premise within compensation plans can be complex, nuanced, and sometimes contentious. It’s essential to balance base salary and variable compensation, ensuring sales representatives are adequately supported and incentivized to pursue new business aggressively.
The debate between 100% commission versus a guaranteed salary represents the spectrum of risk and reward in sales compensation. On one end, a 100% commission plan offers unlimited earning potential but lacks security, potentially leading to a high-stress culture and a short-term focus. It also makes it much more difficult to recruit younger sales superstars who may not have the financial security to afford a 100% commission compensation plan. Conversely, a guaranteed salary provides stability but might dampen the urgency and hunger that drive sales excellence. The consensus among seasoned sales leaders points to a balanced approach, often epitomized by a 50/50 split between base salary and variable compensation. This structure aims to provide a safety net while ensuring sales efforts directly impact earnings.
Understanding the market potential within a sales representative’s territory is critical when setting quotas and compensation. For larger teams, the ability to average performance across the group can help smooth out individual variances. However, in smaller teams or founder-led sales organizations, each member’s contribution is magnified, demanding a more nuanced approach to quota setting. Regardless of team size, aligning individual quotas with company objectives requires a blend of data analysis, market insight, and an appreciation for each territory’s unique challenges and opportunities.
Beyond the structure of compensation plans, the timing and criteria for payouts are pivotal. Monthly payouts can incentivize immediate results and help maintain momentum, whereas quarterly payouts may lead to strategic deal timing but can also introduce cash flow challenges for sales professionals. Moreover, compensation plans should evolve in tandem with a company’s strategic goals, ensuring that sales efforts are aligned with the organization’s overarching priorities.
Crafting effective sales compensation plans is both an art and a science. It demands a deep understanding of human motivation, a clear vision of company objectives, and a commitment to fairness and transparency. By carefully designing compensation structures that reward performance, foster team collaboration, and support long-term strategic goals, companies can create a sales culture that not only meets targets but exceeds them, driving growth and success in the competitive world of B2B sales.
Immediate Action Item 1: Evaluate and Adjust Your Compensation Structure
Assessment of Current Plans: Begin by thoroughly assessing your current sales compensation plan. This involves evaluating how well the existing structure supports your company’s strategic goals and motivates your sales team. Are your sales representatives meeting their targets? Do they feel motivated and supported? These questions can uncover valuable insights into the effectiveness of your compensation plan.
Balanced Compensation Review: Reflect on the balance between your organization’s base salary and variable compensation. Does it align with the 50/50 split recommended by seasoned sales leaders? If not, consider adjusting this balance to provide both security and incentive to your sales team. This balance is crucial for motivating your team while ensuring they are adequately supported.
Action Steps:
Survey your sales team to gather feedback on the current compensation plan.
Analyze sales performance data to identify patterns or areas for improvement.
Consult with HR or compensation specialists to explore potential adjustments.
Implement a pilot program for a new compensation structure in a small team or region to measure its impact before a company-wide rollout.
Immediate Action Item 2: Align Compensation with Strategic Goals and Territory Potential
Quota Setting and Territory Analysis: It’s essential to align individual quotas with the sales territory’s potential and the overarching company objectives. This alignment ensures that sales efforts are directed towards strategic goals, optimizing both individual and team performance.
Compensation Plan Evolution: Regularly review and update your compensation plans to align with your company’s strategic goals. This might mean adjusting the payout criteria, the balance between base and variable compensation, or the targets set for sales representatives.
Action Steps:
Conduct a territory analysis to ensure realistic quotas align with market potential.
Set up a quarterly review process for the compensation plan to ensure it remains aligned with company objectives and market conditions.
Engage sales managers in discussions about territory potential and strategic goals to ensure their input is considered in compensation planning.
Communicate changes in compensation plans clearly and effectively to the entire sales team, ensuring they understand how these changes benefit both them and the company.
Implementing these action items can lead to a more motivated sales team, better alignment with strategic goals, and improved sales performance. Remember, the key to successful sales compensation is not just in the design but in the ongoing evaluation and adjustment to meet the evolving needs of both your sales team and your company.
In B2B sales, mastering the art of quota setting and management is a critical factor driving sales teams’ success across various industries. Whether you’re navigating the complexities of software sales, the intricacies of service offerings, or the demands of manufacturing and distribution, the ability to set realistic yet challenging quotas can significantly impact your team’s performance and, ultimately, your company’s bottom line. This article delves into the essential aspects of quota management, offering valuable insights for salespeople, sales managers aiming to enhance their management capabilities, and CEOs of small companies who find themselves at the helm of sales or managing a team of sales professionals.
At the heart of effective sales management lies the strategic planning process, ideally kicking off well before the new fiscal year begins. Best practices in sales management suggest that CEOs should aim to deliver sales plans and quotas for the coming year by December 1st. This timeline allows sales teams ample opportunity to digest the new targets, make necessary preparations, and hit the ground running as the new year commences. Establishing clear expectations early on fosters a sense of direction and motivation among sales representatives, setting the stage for a productive and goal-oriented year ahead.
However, the task of quota setting extends beyond merely assigning numbers. It requires a deep understanding of your company’s strategic goals, market potential, and the individual capabilities of your sales team. For larger organizations, the luxury of averaging performance across a team can help mitigate the impact of underperformers, while in smaller teams, the challenge intensifies as each member’s contribution weighs heavily on achieving collective goals. Regardless of team size, the key is to strive for a balance that pushes your team to reach new heights without veering into unrealistic expectations.
Quota management also entails navigating the intricacies of assigning quotas that align with company objectives and market realities. Sales leaders must analyze available markets within their representatives’ territories, considering factors such as established customer relationships, potential for new account acquisition, and overall market demand. This analytical approach allows for quotas that are grounded in data and tailored to each sales territory’s unique dynamics.
Moreover, the discussion around quota management underscores the importance of fostering a sales culture that prioritizes relationship building within smaller teams focusing on named accounts and in larger settings where strategic goals dictate sales targets. The emphasis on relationships highlights the notion that successful sales strategies are built on a foundation of trust, understanding, and genuine connections with clients.
Quota setting and management emerge as pivotal elements in the broader sales strategy, demanding careful consideration, strategic planning, and an acute awareness of both internal capabilities and external market conditions. By adopting a methodical approach to quota management, sales leaders can empower their teams to achieve and surpass their targets, driving growth and success in an ever-evolving business environment.
Immediate Action Item 1: Conduct a Comprehensive Sales Team Assessment
Before setting quotas for the upcoming fiscal year, it’s imperative for sales leaders, including CEOs, sales managers, and other decision-makers, to thoroughly assess their sales team’s past performance, capabilities, and areas of improvement. This action item involves gathering data on individual sales representatives’ performance, understanding the strengths and weaknesses of the team, and identifying any gaps in skills or resources that could impact their ability to meet proposed quotas.
Steps to Implement:
Compile Performance Data: Collect and analyze sales performance data from the past year, focusing on metrics such as achieved versus set quotas, the average size of deals closed, the length of the sales cycle, and customer retention rates.
Evaluate Team Capabilities: Assess the skills and expertise of your sales team and determine if any skill gaps need to be addressed through training or hiring.
Set Preliminary Performance Benchmarks: Based on your assessment, set realistic performance benchmarks that consider both the achievements of top performers and the potential of those who are struggling.
This exercise not only aids in setting more accurate and attainable quotas but also provides insights into necessary training or resource allocation that could enhance the team’s overall performance.
Immediate Action Item 2: Align Quota Setting with Strategic Business Goals and Market Analysis
In tandem with assessing your sales team’s capabilities, aligning your quota-setting process with your company’s strategic business goals and a thorough market analysis is crucial. This ensures that the quotas reflect not just the capabilities of your sales team but also the realities of the market and your business’s aspirations.
Steps to Implement:
Conduct Market Analysis: Analyze the market dynamics specific to your industry, including potential for growth, competition, and emerging opportunities. This analysis should also consider the territories assigned to each sales rep, focusing on factors like existing customer relationships and the potential for new account acquisitions.
Review Strategic Business Goals: Revisit your company’s strategic objectives for the upcoming year. Quotas should not only be about meeting sales targets but also about contributing to the company’s broader goals, whether expanding into new markets, launching new products, or increasing market share.
Integrate Market Insights with Business Goals: Use the insights from your market analysis and the understanding of your strategic goals to set challenging yet achievable quotas tailored to the unique dynamics of each sales territory and aligned with where the company aims to grow.
By closely aligning quota setting with a deep understanding of your sales team’s capabilities, market conditions, and strategic business objectives, you create a roadmap for success that is both ambitious and grounded in reality. This approach not only sets your team up for achieving their targets but also ensures that their efforts directly contribute to the company’s overall growth and success.
These immediate actions, rooted in thorough analysis and strategic alignment, provide a solid foundation for setting realistic, motivating quotas that propel sales teams toward achieving exceptional results, thereby enhancing the company’s revenue generation capability and securing its competitive edge in the marketplace.
In business-to-business sales, extending discounts holds a place of ancient reverence, a tactic as old as commerce itself. This approach, crafted to escalate sales volume, capitalizes on a fundamental business purchasing principle: the quest for cost efficiency. By lowering the prices of goods or services, firms aspire to enhance the desirability of their products, thereby aiming to boost demand and, consequently, sales volume. Employing this tactic becomes particularly compelling in scenarios such as launching a new product line during contract renewal phases or seeking to penetrate deeper into highly competitive markets. The underlying premise is straightforward: reduced prices are anticipated to drive up sales volumes, potentially offsetting the dip in margins per unit sold.
However, offering a prospect a discount warrants careful consideration. While the immediate benefits—spiked interest from potential clients, an uptick in sales volumes, and the rapid inventory turnover—might seem enticing, the broader implications unveil a complex set of ramifications. This article endeavors to peel away the layers enveloping this widespread sales strategy, illuminating its influence on profitability, and evaluating its sustainability as a long-term practice.
Navigating the Complexity of Discounting in B2B Sales
At initial consideration, discounts present an ostensibly harmonious scenario: clients secure the products or services they need at reduced rates, while companies witness a boost in sales activity. Nevertheless, the stark reality is that indiscriminate discounting can significantly undermine profitability. This necessitates a nuanced understanding of profitability metrics: gross profit versus net profit.
In professional business-to-business sales, the sales team doesn’t need a CPA, but they should know the basics of finance. Understanding the interplay between Gross Profit, Net Profit, COGS (Cost of Goods Sold), and SG&A (Selling, General & Administrative Expenses) is pivotal for any organization aiming to fine-tune its operational efficiency and profitability. These metrics, each distinct in scope and impact, collectively offer a comprehensive view of a company’s financial health. Let’s delve into these concepts, exploring their nuances and significance in the broader context of business management.
COGS: The Direct Costs Tied to Production
COGS encompasses the direct costs attributable to the production of the goods or services sold by a company. This includes raw materials, labor costs directly involved in production, and manufacturing overheads. COGS is a critical metric for management to consider, as it directly affects the Gross Profit. By optimizing production processes or negotiating better terms with suppliers, a company can effectively lower its COGS, thereby increasing its Gross Profit margin—an essential strategy for enhancing profitability.
SG&A: The Overhead of Running a Business
SG&A represents the cumulative expenses incurred from selling, general, and administrative activities. These are the costs associated with operating the business that are not directly tied to production, including sales force salaries, marketing expenses, rent, utilities, and administrative salaries. SG&A expenses are significant because they do not directly contribute to producing goods or services; they are essential for the company’s day-to-day operations and strategic positioning in the market. Effective management of SG&A expenses can significantly influence a company’s Net Profit, as these costs can either erode or support profitability depending on how they are controlled.
Gross Profit: The Initial Gauge of Profitability
Gross Profit is the initial measure of a company’s financial performance, calculated by subtracting the Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) from the total revenue generated from sales. This figure is crucial because it reflects the efficiency with which a company produces or sources its goods and services before accounting for broader operational costs. For instance, if a company generates $1 million in sales and incurs $600,000 in COGS, its Gross Profit would be $400,000. This metric indicates the company’s production or procurement efficiency but does not account for the overheads and other operating expenses that also impact the company’s profitability.
Net Profit: The Ultimate Measure of Financial Health
Net Profit, often considered the bottom line, is the ultimate indicator of a company’s profitability after all expenses, including COGS, SG&A, interest, and taxes, have been deducted from total revenue. It is the most comprehensive measure of a company’s financial performance, revealing what remains as actual profit. For example, continuing from the Gross Profit scenario, if the company has additional operating expenses of $200,000 and taxes and interest amounting to $50,000, the Net Profit would be $150,000. This figure is paramount for stakeholders to assess the company’s profitability and sustainability.
Gross profit, calculated as the revenue from sales minus the cost of goods sold (COGS), provides an initial insight into the financial gain from sales. Yet, the net profit, the remainder after deducting all operational expenditures, interest, taxes, and Selling, General & Administrative (SGA) expenses from the gross profit, genuinely encapsulates a company’s financial health.
How All Of This Applies to Salespeople
In most companies, the sales team cannot change the COGS or SG&A for any deal. The only thing salespeople can typically control is the Selling Price; from that Selling Price, the costs have to be deducted to calculate the Net Profit.
Let’s dissect the financial dynamics further. Assume a service in the B2B sector is offered at a standard rate of $100,000, with a COGS of $60,000, rendering a gross profit of $40,000—a 40% gross margin. With the 20% SGA and other operational costs factored in, the net profit might settle at $20,000 per sale, constituting a 20% net margin on the transaction.
Assuming the costs in the company are static, introducing a 10% discount drops the service price to $90,000. While the gross profit shrinks to $30,000 after we take out the $60,000 in COGS, the net profit is disproportionately affected. The fixed nature of SGA expenses means they remain constant, dramatically squeezing the net margin. In this example, the net profit after the 10% discount drops from $20,000 to $10,000.
Let’s summarize this example without all of the wording:
0% Discount
5% Discount
10% Discount
List Price
$100,000
$100,000
$100,000
Selling Price
$100.000
$95,000
$90,000
COGS
$60,000
$60,000
$60,000
Gross Profit
$40,000
$35,000
$30,000
SG&A
$20,000
$20,000
$20,000
Net Profit
$20,000
$15,000
$10,000
As you can see from the above table, a 5% discount means a 25% reduction in Net Profit for this hypothetical company. A 10% discount means a 50% discount in Net Profit.
The critical question then becomes: How much additional sales volume is necessary to maintain or increase overall profitability post-discount? The revelation often shocks: a minor discount demands a significant upsurge in sales volume to compensate for the reduced net profitability—a challenging feat in the B2B landscape, where sales cycles are longer and client acquisition efforts more intensive.
Let’s show that math more clearly with the above example. Let’s assume that the above company only sells products with a $100,000 list price and they do 100 deals in a year. That means if all of the deals are at least price, they will achieve a gross revenue of $10,000,000 and a net profit of $2,000,000.
However, if the company gives everyone a 5% discount and the company’s stockholders want the same net profit, they will have to do $2M divided by $15K deals. That is 134 deals or a 34% increase in the number of deals. This means that a 5% discount means the sales team has to close 34% more deals to contribute the same net profit to the shareholders.
If the company gives everyone a 10% discount and the company’s stockholders want the same net profit, they will have to do $2M divided by $10K deals. That is 200 deals or a 100% increase in the number of deals. This means that a 10% discount means the sales team has to close twice the number of deals to contribute the same amount of net profit to the shareholders.
Reassessing the Discount Strategy
The appeal of leveraging discounts to amplify sales volume in the B2B sector is undeniable but fraught with pitfalls. Such strategies can erode net profitability, necessitate unrealistic sales volume increases to maintain financial stability, and might inadvertently signal desperation or devalue the proposition in the eyes of business clients. The purpose of this article is not to outright condemn discounting but to advocate for a strategic application thereof. Companies should meticulously evaluate the immediate allure of increased sales against the enduring implications for profitability. In numerous instances, alternative strategies that add value or enhance service offerings may present a more viable route to growth and financial robustness.
The Commission Conundrum: Revenue vs. Profitability
In the intricate ecosystem of sales and profitability, a critical and often overlooked element is the structure of sales commissions. The traditional commission model incentivizes sales personnel—and, by extension, their managers—based on the volume or dollar value of sales achieved, not the profitability of those sales to the company. This misalignment between the sales force’s motivations and the company’s overarching financial goals can lead to a significant disconnect, particularly in the context of discounting strategies.
As a lever of motivation, sales commissions are designed to spur sales teams to higher performance levels. However, when commissions are tied solely to revenue without consideration for profitability, it encourages a focus on the top line at the expense of the bottom line. For instance, a salesperson might be driven to close deals by offering discounts, thereby boosting their sales figures—and, by extension, their commissions—even if such discounts erode the company’s net profit. This scenario is further compounded if the salesperson’s manager, who also benefits from the team’s revenue performance, supports such discount-driven sales tactics without regard to their impact on profitability.
This model creates a fundamental misalignment between the sales team’s goals and top management’s strategic objectives. While sales teams are propelled towards maximizing raw revenue, top management’s primary concern is enhancing net profit—the company’s financial health indicator. The crux of the problem lies in the fact that discounts, while potentially beneficial for achieving short-term sales targets, can significantly undermine net profit margins. This is particularly true in industries where the cost structure is fixed or semi-fixed, and reducing prices does not proportionately decrease costs.
Implementing Safeguards: Aligning Sales Strategies with Profitability Goals
The solution to this problem lies in implementing robust safeguards and a strategic overhaul of the commission structure. First, establishing a rigorous discount approval process can be an effective checkpoint. This process ensures that discounts align with broader financial strategies and the company’s profitability goals. Such a system might include tiered discount limits, beyond which sales personnel must obtain managerial or executive approval.
Second, reconfiguring the commission model to incorporate profitability metrics can realign the incentives for the sales team with the company’s financial objectives. This might involve setting commissions based on net profit generated by sales rather than gross revenue. Alternatively, a balanced scorecard approach, with MBO goals (Management By Objective), including revenue and profitability targets, can incentivize sales personnel to consider the broader financial implications of their sales tactics.
Bridging the Gap Between Sales and Profitability
The alignment of sales strategies with the company’s profitability objectives is not merely a financial imperative but a strategic necessity. By reevaluating commission structures and implementing safeguards against indiscriminate discounting, companies can ensure that their sales efforts contribute positively to the bottom line. This approach fosters a culture where the sales team is not just focused on meeting revenue targets but is also mindful of the profitability and financial health of the organization. In doing so, companies can bridge the gap between pursuing raw revenue and the imperative of net profit, ensuring long-term sustainability and growth. This strategic alignment is crucial for navigating the complex interplay between sales incentives and company profitability, ultimately leading to a more cohesive and financially robust business model.
The delicate balance between pursuing immediate revenue gains through discounts and maintaining the integrity of net profitability demands a strategic reevaluation. The allure of discounts, often seen as a shortcut to achieving sales targets, undeniably poses a significant challenge to profitability. However, the proper resolution lies not in the mere restriction of discounts but in the fundamental shift towards selling value, cultivating champions within client organizations, and ensuring a seamless product alignment with the customer’s needs and objectives. This comprehensive approach mitigates the adverse effects of discounting on profitability and fortifies the foundation for sustainable, value-driven sales practices.
Selling Value: Elevating the Conversation Beyond Price
The cornerstone of mitigating the need for discounts is effectively articulating and demonstrating value. Value selling transcends the simplistic equation of cost versus features, delving into the tangible and intangible benefits that the product or service brings to the customer. This involves a meticulous understanding of the customer’s business landscape, challenges, and strategic objectives. By positioning the product or service as a pivotal solution that addresses these elements, sales professionals can pivot the conversation from price to value, emphasizing the return on investment (ROI) and the broader impact on the customer’s business.
The art of selling value requires a systematic approach, blending analytical rigor with a deep empathy for the customer’s context. It involves crafting a narrative that resonates with the customer’s aspirations and needs, backed by concrete data and case studies that illustrate the positive outcomes achieved by similar clients. This strategy elevates the customer’s perception of the product and fosters a more profound, consultative relationship that is less susceptible to the commoditization pressures that drive discounting.
Building Champions: The Power of Internal Advocacy
Another pivotal strategy is the cultivation of champions within the customer’s organization. Champions are internal advocates who understand and believe in the product or service’s value and are willing to mobilize support for it within their organization. Building champions involves identifying potential advocates based on their influence, alignment with the product’s value proposition, and professional objectives.
Empowering these champions requires providing them with the knowledge, tools, and confidence to articulate the value proposition internally effectively. This includes tailored presentations, compelling case studies, and data-driven ROI analyses that they can use to persuade other stakeholders. Champions serve as a critical bridge, amplifying the sales message and facilitating a deeper engagement with the customer organization. They help navigate internal dynamics and objections, making the sales process more efficient and reducing the reliance on discounts as a persuasive tool.
Aligning Product to Customer’s Needs and Goals: The Keystone of Value
At the heart of the solution to discount-driven sales challenges lies the alignment of the product or service with the customer’s needs and goals. This alignment ensures that the offering is not just a generic solution but a strategic fit that addresses specific challenges and capitalizes on unique opportunities within the customer’s business. Achieving this alignment requires a consultative sales approach characterized by active listening, probing questions, and a collaborative exploration of the customer’s business environment.
This process involves understanding the current needs and anticipating future challenges and opportunities. The sales professional must adopt a strategic advisor role, leveraging insights and expertise to guide the customer toward solutions that meet immediate needs and support long-term objectives. This level of alignment fosters a partnership-based relationship, where the product or service’s value is inherently recognized, reducing the customer’s sensitivity to price and diminishing the need for discounts.
A Strategic Blueprint for Sustainable Sales Success
The challenges posed by discounting strategies to profitability are significant but manageable. The proper solution lies in a holistic approach that focuses on selling value, building champions, and ensuring a deep alignment between the product and the customer’s needs and goals. This strategy requires a shift from transactional sales tactics to a more consultative and value-driven sales methodology.
By effectively selling value, sales professionals can elevate the conversation beyond price, emphasizing the broader business impact and ROI of their offering. Building champions within customer organizations create powerful allies who can advocate for the product internally, leveraging their influence to support the sales process. Finally, ensuring that the product is closely aligned with the customer’s strategic needs and goals solidifies the foundation for a partnership-based relationship, where the inherent value of the solution diminishes the focus on price and negates the need for discounts.
This approach addresses the immediate challenge of maintaining profitability in the face of discount pressures and lays the groundwork for sustainable sales success. It fosters more profound and more meaningful customer relationships built on a foundation of trust, value, and strategic alignment. In doing so, it positions companies to achieve short-term sales targets and long-term business objectives, securing a competitive advantage in the complex landscape of B2B sales.
Actions That You Can Take Today
To address the challenge of discounts affecting profitability without altering COGS or SG&A costs, sales managers and CEOs can implement the following five actionable steps today to enhance their company’s profitability through strategic sales practices:
Reframe the Sales Conversation Around Value, Not Price: Train your sales team to pivot discussions with clients from price to the comprehensive value your product or service offers. This involves deepening their understanding of the client’s business needs and how your solutions can address these needs in a way that contributes positively to the client’s profitability and operational efficiency. Encourage your team to prepare case studies and ROI analyses that clearly articulate the long-term benefits and cost savings of choosing your product or service over cheaper alternatives.
Introduce a Value-based Commission Structure: Redesign the commission structure to reward sales personnel not just for gross revenue, but also for selling at or near list price, thereby preserving or enhancing profitability. This could include bonuses for deals closed without discounts or additional incentives for upselling value-adding features or services that improve customer outcomes without significantly increasing discount levels.
Establish Strict Discount Approval Processes: Implement a tiered approval process for discounts requiring higher management levels to sign off on larger discounts. This process should include a profitability analysis to ensure that any discounts granted do not erode the net profit margin below an acceptable threshold. Making the discounting process more rigorous will encourage sales teams to seek alternative strategies to close deals.
Cultivate and Empower Internal Champions: Develop a program to identify and nurture champions within your prospects—key individuals who understand and believe in the value of your solutions. Provide these champions with the tools and information they need to advocate effectively on your behalf, turning them into an extension of your sales team. This might include exclusive insights into product development, customized value assessments, or early access to new features or services.
Align Sales Goals with Strategic Business Objectives: Ensure that your sales team’s objectives align with the company’s broader strategic goals, particularly profitability. This might involve setting specific targets for selling certain products or services with higher profit margins or developing bundled offerings that meet customer needs more comprehensively while improving profitability. Regularly review these goals and the strategies employed to achieve them, adjusting as necessary to keep your sales efforts focused on enhancing the bottom line.
By implementing these strategies, sales managers and CEOs can drive their teams towards practices that maintain and potentially increase profitability, even when discounts are off the table. These action items foster a culture of value selling, strategic negotiation, and customer-centric solutions, ultimately contributing to sustainable growth and profitability.
Designing an effective sales compensation plan is critical to any successful sales organization. A well-crafted plan motivates your sales team, drives revenue growth, and aligns the interests of both the company and the sales representatives.
It’s essential to understand the impact of compensation on salespeople. Sales reps are highly motivated by money, and their income is directly tied to their performance. Incentives such as bonuses, commissions, and accelerators can all play a key role in driving sales performance. However, these incentives can have unintended consequences if not implemented correctly.
This blog post will explore various aspects of creating a successful sales compensation plan, including setting quotas, selecting base and variable pay, using accelerators, and employing rewards and contests. We’ll also discuss strategies for designing effective compensation plans for different types of sales roles and tips for continuously improving your compensation plan.
A common question that I receive is about the value of adding fractional sales leadership to their company. I typically answer their concern with a story about one of my clients who had a fantastic experience and increased the company’s value by 167% in about 12 months.
The true benefit of the efforts of fractional sales leadership is that revenue and pipeline will increase your company’s value.
Several years ago, I was hired by a fantastic software startup company in the artificial intelligence industry. Their technology had roots in original research by one of the founders at MIT. I was connected to one of the founders, and he approached me to be his Fractional Vice President of Sales as they felt that their technology had progressed to the point that they needed to find early adopter customers.
It was a young company with a small client base and very little revenue, but it clearly understood its offering and the value it could deliver to new clients. I started the engagement with my standard discovery process to identify what value they were providing to their clients or prospective clients. We developed a target persona, and I helped them identify potential clients that fit their use cases.
As I worked with them, I learned more about their backstory. A significant chip manufacturer had wanted to buy the company just a few months earlier. The founders were eager to sell, but the parties couldn’t agree on a price and parted ways. The large chip manufacturer valued the company at about 75% of the valuation that the founders wanted. This offer reminded me of the popular TV show Shark Tank, where entrepreneurs try to arrange investments from 5 individual investors. They rarely agree at the beginning of the segment on the startup’s value; sometimes, they compromise, and sometimes they do not. In this case, the giant chip manufacturer didn’t see the value, just like the Sharks didn’t see the value of Ring.
The owners of my client did what any sound company executives would do. They pushed harder on their business to build its value. They realized that nothing drives the company’s value like revenue and pipeline, so they brought me in to help them.
Fast forward ten months after hiring me, and our pipeline, messaging, sales team, partnerships, and methodologies have improved dramatically. At this point, another chip manufacturer enters the picture and wants to acquire the company and its technology. But now everything in the company is more proven, and the risk is less for the acquiring company. The owners and the new acquiring company agreed quickly on the company’s value. The company was now worth 200% of what the founders initially thought just the previous year. The deal closed quickly and efficiently, with most employees finding great jobs at the new owner while some continued with new and exciting adventures.
New customers, pipeline growth, and team growth caused a dramatic increase in the company’s value. Undoubtedly, the software improved during that year, but much of that improvement was because of customer and prospect feedback. The new chip manufacturer thought the company was worth 267% compared to the previous suitor.
According to the Exit Planning Institute, 76 percent of business owners who sold their businesses profoundly regretted selling within a year. I contend that this is because they agreed to a Shark Tank deal which devalued their company. I think most feel they didn’t get the value out of the company they spent years, decades, or maybe a lifetime building. The solution is to have such a great sales engine that the buyer is begging you to take the offer. Small business owners need to build a sales engine that is so strong that multiple offers are coming in to buy the company. For a while in the US after COVID-19, selling a home commanded over-asking-price offers all over the nation. This seller’s market is the environment you need to create for your company if you want to exit the company in the next 3-5 years.
I help company owners realize the maximum value of their company by improving their revenue generation capability. I help owners enhance their sales management, methodologies, processes, teams, and messaging to accomplish this. Reach out to me so that I can help you maximize your company’s value the way I helped my former client.
As a company owner, one of the most important aspects of running a successful business is setting and achieving sales objectives. But how do you determine what those objectives should be? Here’s a step-by-step guide to help you set realistic and achievable sales goals for your business.
Sales objectives are goals a company sets for its sales team to achieve over a certain period. These objectives can be anything from increasing revenue by a certain percentage to selling a certain number of products or services. Sales objectives should be set annually, but they can also be set for shorter periods such as quarters or months.
Let’s talk about the basic steps first.
Define your overall goal.
Break down your overall goal into smaller, more manageable goals.
Create a timeline for each goal.
Assign responsibility for each goal to a specific team member or department.
Measure progress and revise objectives as needed.
Celebrate accomplishments and learn from failures.
Define your overall goal.
Sales goals are essential for any company regardless of size. They give you a target to aim for and help to motivate your sales team. Without a goal, getting complacent and falling into bad habits is easy.
It’s essential to clearly understand your company’s sales process before setting a goal. You need to know your closing rate, average deal size, and how many leads you need to generate to hit your target. Once you have this information, you can start to play around with different numbers to see what’s realistic.
The global pandemic has caused crisis after crisis to hit US companies. These crises include:
global supply chain problems affecting worldwide shipping
increased prices due to the shortage of components or subassemblies
labor shortages
To assist our clients, Sean O’Shaughnessey and Kevin Lawson teamed up to create the following webinar. The webinar originally aired on January 13, 2022.
The following is a transcript of the webinar video above. It has been sparsely edited to increase its readability, but many of the idioms and poor spoken grammar have been left in place. The transcription was automatically generated by Sonix.ai and, as capable as that product is, there are times when words are missed or sentence structure was incorrectly interpreted. We have tried to catch all of these software misses, but we are confident that some still remain. The below text is provided for those that would rather read than watch a video.
