Skip to content

follow-up

What An MBA Didn’t Teach You About Sales

The sales profession is challenging. You need to work hard at it to succeed. You need to learn from the best. You need to improve your skills continuously. If you think you can sell since you are a hit at parties and have a lot of friends, you may soon find that you are a failure as a salesperson. Blunt truth:

because the sales profession is so hard, you have to focus on doing everything in sales very well, or you will be considered a failure.

I call this blog, Skinned Knees because I try to relate all of the learning that I have done over the past 4+ decades (while skinning my knees in the learning process).

I hope that you learn from my mistakes so that your business will grow!

AI Sales Coaching: How to Stop Rescuing Deals and Start Developing Salespeople

There is a dangerous moment in the growth of many B2B companies. It happens when the best salesperson becomes the sales manager.

The promotion seems obvious. This person consistently exceeds quota, understands customers, knows how to close difficult deals, and has earned the team’s respect. Who could be better qualified?

Six months later, that same person is personally rescuing the team’s largest opportunities, handling difficult customer objections, negotiating with executives, and keeping the forecast alive.

The company’s revenue looks healthy. The owner is satisfied. The sales manager appears indispensable.

And that is precisely the problem.

The company hasn’t developed a scalable sales organization. It has become dependent on one talented individual. Artificial intelligence offers an opportunity to change this pattern. But only if we rethink what sales management should accomplish.

The Difference Between Managing Deals and Developing Salespeople

Traditional sales management relies heavily on inspection and intervention. Managers review pipeline reports, examine forecasts, enforce activity requirements, and intervene when opportunities get into trouble. These activities are necessary, but they are not the same as coaching.

Consider a salesperson who confidently announces during a pipeline review that Mary is the Champion for a major opportunity. The manager suspects that Mary is simply a friendly contact who likes the product. An experienced manager might join the next customer meeting, take control of the conversation, and personally secure executive support. The opportunity might close. Unfortunately, the salesperson hasn’t developed the ability to identify and validate a real Champion.

A better manager asks a different question:

“What has Mary actually done that proves she is your Champion?”

Has Mary introduced the salesperson to important stakeholders? Has she explained the customer’s internal decision process? Has she advocated for the solution when the salesperson wasn’t present? Has she taken any personal risk to help the opportunity advance? If the salesperson cannot identify meaningful actions, the relationship remains an untested hypothesis.

The manager’s next responsibility isn’t to take over. It is to help the salesperson determine how to test that relationship. That coaching conversation improves the salesperson’s judgment, potentially affecting every future opportunity.

The objective of sales leadership is not to make the manager better at closing deals. It is to make the entire team better at closing deals.

Read the rest of the article…

AI Sales Automation: Why Your Chatbot Is Not a Sales Process

Imagine preparing for an important customer meeting. You open your favorite AI assistant, give it the prospect’s name, and ask for a summary of the company’s business challenges and the questions you should ask. Within seconds, you receive a beautifully written briefing. The assistant identifies potential operational problems, competitive pressures, and several opportunities to demonstrate the value of your solution.

There’s just one problem. One of those impressive insights concerns an acquisition the prospect supposedly completed last year.

Except the acquisition never happened.

The artificial intelligence fabricated a plausible business event and presented it as fact. Had you trusted the briefing, you might have opened your meeting with a question that immediately damaged your credibility.

This scenario illustrates a much larger problem with how B2B sales organizations use AI.

We’re asking artificial intelligence to perform too many different kinds of work without distinguishing which tasks require intelligence and which require reliable execution.

That distinction matters more than the sophistication of the AI model you choose.

The Problem Isn’t Just Hallucinations. It’s Process Design.

Salespeople increasingly rely on ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and other Generative AI applications to prepare for meetings, research prospects, write follow-up messages, and analyze opportunities. Those are legitimate applications of AI. In fact, I’d question why a salesperson with access to these capabilities wouldn’t use them. But consider what happens before the salesperson receives a useful answer.

They retrieve information from their CRM, gather previous meeting notes, identify stakeholders, check pricing, and reconstruct details from previous conversations. They paste everything into their AI assistant, ask a question, verify the response, and correct any mistakes.

Tomorrow, they repeat the process for another customer.

The AI may have improved the quality of their analysis, but the underlying sales process remains largely manual.

When twenty salespeople independently reconstruct the same process every day, you don’t have an AI adoption problem. You have a sales management problem.

You’re paying experienced professionals to repeatedly assemble information that your existing systems should already provide.

The solution isn’t necessarily better prompting. It’s better workflow design.

Read the rest of the article…

AI Prospecting Agents: Build More Pipeline Without Adding More SDRs

One of the more frustrating realities in modern sales is that a company can invest heavily in technology and still leave its best salespeople doing work that should never require their time.

The CRM is open. So is LinkedIn. There is an intent-data platform in another tab, a contact database in another, a sales engagement platform somewhere else, and perhaps a conversation intelligence tool running in the background.

The company has a technology stack. What it may not have is a prospecting system.

That distinction matters.

A collection of tools still depends on someone remembering which accounts matter, noticing when a former champion changes jobs, deciding which buying signals deserve attention, researching the account, moving information between systems, writing the message, and following up. When people are the integration layer connecting all those systems, the company has not really automated prospecting. It has simply given its salespeople more software to operate.

The Prospecting Advantage Has Changed

Traditional outbound sales was built around scarcity. Finding contact information, researching a company, and uncovering a credible reason to approach someone required significant effort. That made volume difficult and valuable.

Artificial intelligence changed those economics.

Today, generating another email is nearly free. Finding another prospect is relatively easy. AI can produce hundreds or thousands of messages faster than a sales team could ever review them. That does not make those messages valuable.

When volume becomes inexpensive, volume stops being a competitive advantage. Relevance becomes the scarce resource.

We need to evolve our systems away from asking, “How can we send more outreach?” Rather, we need to be thinking of, “How can we identify the people who deserve our attention right now and give our salespeople something useful to say when they contact them?”

A modern prospecting system therefore has to answer five questions continuously:

  1. Who should we pursue?
  2. Why should we pursue them now?
  3. What should we say?
  4. Which channel and timing gives us the best chance of engagement?
  5. When should a human salesperson enter the conversation?

The fifth question is particularly important.

Read the rest of the article…

How to Build a More Stable Pipeline with a Better B2B Sales Outreach Strategy

Full-cycle salespeople create pipeline instability when outreach is treated as a series of individual efforts instead of a managed operating system.

The issue is rarely enough effort. Most salespeople will work hard when the pipeline gets thin. The problem is that reactive effort results in uneven revenue generation. Activity surges when opportunities dry up, then slows when active deals demand attention. That cycle produces the familiar pattern: intense prospecting, temporary pipeline relief, missed follow-up, then another gap.

A diversified outreach strategy gives the salesperson a more stable demand-creation engine. It creates multiple entry points into the market, reduces dependence on any single channel, and keeps opportunity creation moving while deals are being advanced.

Diversification does not mean random activity across email, phone, LinkedIn, referrals, content, and events. It means each channel has a role, a message, a sequence, and a management cadence.

The starting point is a defined target contact universe. Salespeople need a clean, accurate list of the right companies, titles, buying roles, and relationship paths. Tools such as LinkedIn Sales Navigator, Seamless AI, and KnowledgeNet can help build that base, but the tool is secondary. The discipline is knowing exactly who belongs in the outreach system and why.

Read the rest of the article…

The Buyer’s Clock Starts Before Your Sales Team Notices

A buyer does not become urgent when your CRM creates a record. The buyer became urgent earlier; at that moment, they decided the problem was worth interrupting their day for.

That distinction matters because too many B2B companies design their inbound process around internal workflow rather than buyer momentum. A prospect searches, compares, reads, evaluates, talks to a peer, visits your site, reviews your proof, and finally raises their hand. Then the company they contacted responds as though the buyer has agreed to wait patiently while marketing automation, CRM routing, territory logic, rep availability, and inbox notifications sort themselves out.

That is not a speed problem. It is a revenue system problem.

The real issue is not whether a sales rep should call faster. Of course they should. The deeper question is whether the business can detect, interpret, prioritize, enrich, route, and respond to buyer intent while the buyer still cares. When the answer is no, the company loses revenue without realizing it. The lost buyer does not announce their departure. They simply book with someone else, cool off, or decide the issue can wait.

This is why inbound orchestration deserves executive attention. High-intent inbound activity is not a generic lead flow. A demo request from a target-fit company is not the same as a newsletter signup. A pricing inquiry is not the same as a content download. Treating all of them as “leads” may simplify reporting, but it destroys commercial judgment.

When every lead looks the same, nothing feels urgent.

Read the rest of the article…

Compelling Events: Shorten Sales Cycles & Improve Forecasts

Deals move when the buyer’s business calendar forces a decision.

A real compelling event is the operating discipline that separates pipeline from possibility. It gives urgency a business reason, attaches dates to consequences, and forces both sides to decide whether the opportunity deserves serious time, resources, and executive attention.

Many salespeople confuse need with urgency. That mistake creates bloated forecasts, stalled proposals, and too many “just checking in” follow-ups. A prospect can have a real need and still have no reason to act now. They may need

  • better integrations,
  • stronger reporting,
  • reduced churn,
  • tighter compliance,
  • faster workflows,
  • a cleaner technology stack.

Those needs matter, but they can live on a roadmap indefinitely.

A compelling event changes the conversation because something meaningful happens by a specific date.

  • An audit is scheduled.
  • A contract expires.
  • A board commitment has been made.
  • A market launch is tied to revenue.
  • A facility lease ends.
  • A regulatory requirement becomes enforceable.
  • A major customer is at risk.

These events create pressure because delays have consequences beyond the buying team’s preferences.

That is the standard. A compelling event has a date, an owner, and a consequence.

The Difference Between Interest and Commitment

Interest sounds productive in a sales conversation. Commitment behaves differently.

Interested buyers will schedule meetings, request demos, review capabilities, and discuss future-state improvements. Committed buyers will help you understand the decision path, expose internal constraints, validate timing, and clarify what happens if the outcome is missed.

The difference matters because your forecast depends on the customer’s decision reality, not your sales activity.

A compelling event gives you that reality. It tells you why the buyer is engaged now, who owns the risk, what business outcome must be protected, and which internal processes must be navigated to get there. Without that clarity, the opportunity may still be real, but it should be treated as unproven.

Sales leaders should inspect this with discipline. “They are excited” is not a compelling event. “Budget season” is not enough. “They want to modernize” is too soft. The better question is: what changed in their business that makes inaction costly?

That question protects your time and the buyer’s time.

Read the rest of the article…

Reclaim Selling Time: How AI Eliminates the Sales Tax and Restores Pipeline Momentum

Most sales leaders are trying to solve a 2026 productivity problem with 2010 management logic. They hire more people, increase activity targets, and apply pressure to the same system. The system doesn’t respond because the constraint isn’t an effort. It’s architecture.

The operational reality is brutal: administrative work is consuming the day and choking selling time. Reps are stuck doing low-level research, logging notes, and stitching together follow-ups across disconnected tools. That “sales tax” creates a momentum gap between good conversations and slow execution. The outcome is predictable: fewer high-quality touches, slower deal movement, less accurate forecasting, and a pipeline that looks busy yet remains fragile.

The fix is not another round of tactical efficiency. It’s a structural reversal: move from a human-led, tech-assisted model to a tech-led, human-centric model. In that design, AI does the machine work—data extraction, workflow orchestration, logging, drafting, hygiene—and the human seller does the work that actually wins deals: judgment, stakeholder navigation, risk reduction, and credibility in the moments that matter.

Think of it as building a Cognitive Revenue Engine. Your reps stop being the engine. They become the orchestrators of an automated engine that produces consistent execution at scale.

This shift has two pillars.

Tactical Efficiency is your time reclaimer. Automate the tollbooth moments: post-call notes, CRM updates, basic research, and first-draft follow-ups. This is not about saving a few minutes. It’s about reclaiming hundreds of hours per rep per year and converting them into customer-facing time.

Strategic Intelligence is where the advantage compounds. AI should be used as a decision partner, not a faster typewriter. The questions change from “Can you write this email?” to “Given this account’s context and our past wins, what risk is most likely to stall this deal, and what’s the next best action?” That is the difference between activity and impact, and it’s the difference between noise and revenue generation.

Read the rest of the article…

From CRM Debt to a Cognitive Revenue Engine: Reclaiming Selling Time with AI

Most B2B sales teams don’t have a talent problem. They have a capacity problem.

Administrative drag is quietly stripping selling time: CRM updates, stakeholder mapping, duplicate cleanup, meeting summaries, and the constant “what should I say next?” work that should not be consuming a senior seller’s day. The downstream damage is bigger than annoyance. Forecast accuracy declines, coaching becomes reactive, and revenue management turns into a negotiation with incomplete data.

Artificial intelligence can fix this, but only if you use it with the right operating model.

Benjamin Todd’s article “How not to lose your job to AI” makes the point that AI doesn’t simply eliminate jobs; it shifts where value concentrates. As routine tasks become cheap, the remaining human bottlenecks become more valuable. Todd’s ATM example is the cleanest version of the idea: ATMs reduced the need for “money counting,” but the overall demand for human banking roles didn’t collapse. The job shifted toward customer-facing work and higher-leverage conversations.

In B2B sales, our “money counting” is CRM entry, list building, and manual research. Our high-leverage work is business acumen, strategic influence, stakeholder alignment, and value selling. The problem is that most teams have it backwards: humans do the hardest input work (research, logging, hygiene), then AI writes the customer-facing messages. That combination produces drained sellers and generic messaging.

A better model is: Automate the input, humanize the output.

Read the rest of the article…

Instant Follow-Up in Field Sales: How AI Eliminates Post-Meeting Lag

Field sales doesn’t lose deals in the meeting. It loses deals after the meeting when a buyer asks a high-stakes question, you promise to “get back to them,” and the response shows up after the moment has passed. That delay kills momentum and quietly downgrades you from advisor to administrator.

In 2026, the buyer often has access to comparable information. Your differentiation is contextual insight delivered with speed. If your follow-up arrives hours later (or worse, it arrives days later), you’re not doing value selling, you’re doing cleanup. That’s the Administrative Tax: notes, recap emails, CRM updates, and retrieval work that should not be done manually by your highest-paid revenue generator.

Artificial intelligence changes the operating model. The goal isn’t “better summaries.” It’s an Instant Field Response: capture what matters in the room, retrieve the right internal assets, and draft a precise follow-up while you’re still in the parking lot. When AI handles the science (capture, entity recognition, semantic search, and drafting), you reclaim the art: listening, reading intent, and leading the decision.

Read the rest of the article…

The Great Filter – Why Most People Should Quit B2B Sales Today

If you want fairness, choose a role where performance is measured by compliance and consistency. If you want wealth, stay in sales and accept the only rule that matters: compensation follows captured value.

Walk into any growth-stage B2B sales organization, and you see two populations immediately:

  • One group is stuck in grievance. They stare at the CRM, explain shortfalls with lead quality, territory math, product gaps, or “unrealistic quota.” They want a manager to prescribe the playbook and then validate the effort. Their mindset is hourly, even when they’re paid a salary plus commission.
  • The other group is operating a different model. They talk about leverage, pipeline physics, conversion rates, deal control, and enterprise value. They create their own opportunities. They build customer confidence and earn the right to ask for a decision. They are not looking for comfort. They are looking for the wire.

If you identify with the first group, here’s the most respectful advice I can give you: exit sales on purpose. Move into HR, operations, finance, project management, enablement, customer success, analytics, or any role where the exchange is stable and the scorecard is predictable. Those functions matter. They are important and critical to most companies. They keep companies alive. They are also structurally designed to be fairer.

Sales is designed to be variable, value-based, and exposed. That’s the point.

The safety-net trap

Most people walk into sales carrying the wrong conditioning. School teaches that effort should correlate with reward. Show up, do the work, get the grade. Many corporate functions reinforce it. Do the tasks, hit the process metrics, stay inside the lines, and get the raise.

That conditioning becomes a trap the moment you step into a quota role.

In “fair” roles, compensation tracks your cost and your consistency. Your output is capped by your time, so your income is capped by a band. It’s stable, and it’s a ceiling.

Sales is different because it’s one of the few places left where pay can scale with impact. You are not paid for effort. You are paid for outcomes. That makes it feel brutal to people who want certainty, and it feels like freedom to people who want upside.

The moment you need the world to be fair, sales will punish you. The moment you accept the model, sales becomes one of the most rational games in business.

B2B Sales is rewarding because it isn’t easy or fair
Read the rest of the article…