Skip to content

Sales leadership

What An MBA Didn’t Teach You About Sales

The sales profession is challenging. You need to work hard at it to succeed. You need to learn from the best. You need to improve your skills continuously. If you think you can sell since you are a hit at parties and have a lot of friends, you may soon find that you are a failure as a salesperson. Blunt truth:

because the sales profession is so hard, you have to focus on doing everything in sales very well, or you will be considered a failure.

I call this blog, Skinned Knees because I try to relate all of the learning that I have done over the past 4+ decades (while skinning my knees in the learning process).

I hope that you learn from my mistakes so that your business will grow!

How to Build a Sales Organization That Survives a Founder Exit

Navigating the complexities of business transitions can be quite a journey, especially for those in sales and leadership roles. When a founder chooses to pass the baton, whether through selling to someone outside the company, passing it within the family, or setting up an employee stock ownership plan, each option comes with its own unique challenges and chances for growth. For salespeople, sales managers, and CEOs of small companies, understanding these dynamics is really important.

When a business owner considers selling to an external buyer, they often experience a surprising realization: the valuation shock. It’s common for owners to overestimate their company’s worth, only to encounter a reality check during the valuation process. This moment is so important because it influences all future negotiations and strategies. Buyers don’t just look at the numbers; they also carefully examine the business’s sales processes and the owner’s involvement. Here, the owner’s role as the main salesperson can be both a strength and a challenge. If the owner accounts for a large share of sales, such as 30%, it can worry potential buyers. 

The key is to build a business that can thrive even when the owner isn’t around, supported by a solid sales system and a talented team eager to keep everything running smoothly.

For the owner contemplating a sale, preparation is key. 

The question to ponder is: what if you were suddenly unavailable? 

Read the rest of the article…

The Buyer’s Clock Starts Before Your Sales Team Notices

A buyer does not become urgent when your CRM creates a record. The buyer became urgent earlier; at that moment, they decided the problem was worth interrupting their day for. That distinction matters because too many B2B companies design their inbound process around internal workflow rather than buyer momentum. A prospect searches, compares, reads, evaluates, talks to a peer, visits your site, reviews your proof, and finally raises their hand. Then the company they contacted… 

Revenue Forecasting Should Be Built on Evidence, Not Hope

Most sales forecasts are not really forecasts. They are seller opinions, manager adjustments, CRM fields, historical averages, and optimism packaged into a number that leadership is expected to trust.

That may have been acceptable when forecasting was mostly an internal sales exercise. It is not acceptable when the board, finance, hiring plans, customer success capacity, and investor expectations are all tied to the revenue number.

The core problem is not that sales leaders are careless. The problem is that many revenue teams are still using an architecture that cannot produce predictability. Spreadsheets, commit calls, and stage rollups organize information, but they do not necessarily reveal the buyer’s truth.

The better question is not, “How confident is the rep?”

The better question is, “What did the buyer actually do?”

That shift changes the entire operating model. Forecasting moves from hope-based to evidence-based. Deals are no longer judged by the confidence in a seller’s voice but by observable buyer behavior: recent engagement, executive involvement, mutual action plans, legal or procurement movement, real next steps, and date-driven urgency.

This is where artificial intelligence and revenue intelligence become useful, but only if the management system is ready for them. AI can identify patterns, detect risk, surface stalled deals, and compare buyer behavior against historical outcomes. But it cannot compensate for weak sales processes, vague stage definitions, poor CRM hygiene, or managers who refuse to inspect the evidence.

Read the rest of the article…

AI Will Not Fix Sales Problems Built on Fragmented CRM Data

Most sales leaders are asking the wrong question about artificial intelligence.

They ask which AI tool to buy, which platform has the best features, which automation will save the most time, or which sales technology will help their reps move faster. Those questions matter, but they are downstream from the real issue.

The more important question is: Does your CRM provide AI with enough trusted context to make useful recommendations?

If the answer is no, the next tool will not solve the problem. It will accelerate the confusion.

AI cannot reason well from fractured data. If account history lives in email, proposal tools, LinkedIn messages, spreadsheets, call notes, support tickets, and half-completed CRM fields, the AI is not operating from a complete commercial picture. It is guessing from fragments. A faster guess is still a guess.

That is why the CRM must evolve from a passive system of record into an active system of action. The old CRM was built to store yesterday’s activity. The modern CRM has to help shape tomorrow’s decisions.

A strong CRM foundation gives sellers a complete account context before a call. It helps managers understand pipeline risk without relying only on rep opinion. It allows AI to recommend next steps because the recommendation is grounded in actual customer history, not generic sales theory. It gives the organization leverage because the patterns learned in one deal can improve the next similar deal.

Read the rest of the article…

Reclaim Selling Time: How AI Eliminates the Sales Tax and Restores Pipeline Momentum

Most sales leaders are trying to solve a 2026 productivity problem with 2010 management logic. They hire more people, increase activity targets, and apply pressure to the same system. The system doesn’t respond because the constraint isn’t an effort. It’s architecture.

The operational reality is brutal: administrative work is consuming the day and choking selling time. Reps are stuck doing low-level research, logging notes, and stitching together follow-ups across disconnected tools. That “sales tax” creates a momentum gap between good conversations and slow execution. The outcome is predictable: fewer high-quality touches, slower deal movement, less accurate forecasting, and a pipeline that looks busy yet remains fragile.

The fix is not another round of tactical efficiency. It’s a structural reversal: move from a human-led, tech-assisted model to a tech-led, human-centric model. In that design, AI does the machine work—data extraction, workflow orchestration, logging, drafting, hygiene—and the human seller does the work that actually wins deals: judgment, stakeholder navigation, risk reduction, and credibility in the moments that matter.

Think of it as building a Cognitive Revenue Engine. Your reps stop being the engine. They become the orchestrators of an automated engine that produces consistent execution at scale.

This shift has two pillars.

Tactical Efficiency is your time reclaimer. Automate the tollbooth moments: post-call notes, CRM updates, basic research, and first-draft follow-ups. This is not about saving a few minutes. It’s about reclaiming hundreds of hours per rep per year and converting them into customer-facing time.

Strategic Intelligence is where the advantage compounds. AI should be used as a decision partner, not a faster typewriter. The questions change from “Can you write this email?” to “Given this account’s context and our past wins, what risk is most likely to stall this deal, and what’s the next best action?” That is the difference between activity and impact, and it’s the difference between noise and revenue generation.

Read the rest of the article…

From CRM Debt to a Cognitive Revenue Engine: Reclaiming Selling Time with AI

Most B2B sales teams don’t have a talent problem. They have a capacity problem.

Administrative drag is quietly stripping selling time: CRM updates, stakeholder mapping, duplicate cleanup, meeting summaries, and the constant “what should I say next?” work that should not be consuming a senior seller’s day. The downstream damage is bigger than annoyance. Forecast accuracy declines, coaching becomes reactive, and revenue management turns into a negotiation with incomplete data.

Artificial intelligence can fix this, but only if you use it with the right operating model.

Benjamin Todd’s article “How not to lose your job to AI” makes the point that AI doesn’t simply eliminate jobs; it shifts where value concentrates. As routine tasks become cheap, the remaining human bottlenecks become more valuable. Todd’s ATM example is the cleanest version of the idea: ATMs reduced the need for “money counting,” but the overall demand for human banking roles didn’t collapse. The job shifted toward customer-facing work and higher-leverage conversations.

In B2B sales, our “money counting” is CRM entry, list building, and manual research. Our high-leverage work is business acumen, strategic influence, stakeholder alignment, and value selling. The problem is that most teams have it backwards: humans do the hardest input work (research, logging, hygiene), then AI writes the customer-facing messages. That combination produces drained sellers and generic messaging.

A better model is: Automate the input, humanize the output.

Read the rest of the article…

Instant Follow-Up in Field Sales: How AI Eliminates Post-Meeting Lag

Field sales doesn’t lose deals in the meeting. It loses deals after the meeting when a buyer asks a high-stakes question, you promise to “get back to them,” and the response shows up after the moment has passed. That delay kills momentum and quietly downgrades you from advisor to administrator.

In 2026, the buyer often has access to comparable information. Your differentiation is contextual insight delivered with speed. If your follow-up arrives hours later (or worse, it arrives days later), you’re not doing value selling, you’re doing cleanup. That’s the Administrative Tax: notes, recap emails, CRM updates, and retrieval work that should not be done manually by your highest-paid revenue generator.

Artificial intelligence changes the operating model. The goal isn’t “better summaries.” It’s an Instant Field Response: capture what matters in the room, retrieve the right internal assets, and draft a precise follow-up while you’re still in the parking lot. When AI handles the science (capture, entity recognition, semantic search, and drafting), you reclaim the art: listening, reading intent, and leading the decision.

Read the rest of the article…

Zombie Deals in B2B Sales: How AI Improves Forecast Accuracy and Coaching

Zombie deals aren’t a pipeline nuisance. They’re a leadership problem with a math problem attached.

A deal that sits in “Proposal” for months doesn’t just cloud your forecast. It steals capacity. Every hour a rep spends nurturing a flatlined opportunity is an hour not spent creating new demand, advancing real deals, or improving customer trust. Multiply that across a team, and you get the same symptom every quarter: missed numbers, reactive hiring decisions, and management time wasted on interrogations that create more friction than clarity.

The common response is predictable: more pipeline discipline. More required fields. More approvals. Longer forecast calls. More “updates.” That feels like control, but it’s usually just activity theater. It increases administrative drag and reduces selling time, exactly the opposite of what revenue management needs.

The fix is a mindset shift: move from intuition to evidence.

Read the rest of the article…

The Dual Blueprint Requirement: Why Growth Demands Two Plans, Not One

Launching a company or steering one through a merger, turnaround, or major transition requires clarity about how value will be created and, just as importantly, how revenue will actually be generated.

Many leadership teams recognize the need for a Business Plan, but overlook that sustainable growth requires a second, complementary plan. The main breakdown is not the strategy itself, but the assumption that strategy automatically creates revenue. Bridging strategy and revenue requires a distinct plan for that conversion, targeting a different audience.

The Business Plan sets direction from the top down. The Sales Plan is validated by demonstrating how that direction can become actual revenue from the bottom up.

Both are essential. Neither works in isolation.

The Business Plan: Charting the Course (Top-Down)

The Business Plan exists to answer specific questions for a particular audience. Its primary readers are CEOs, CFOs, bankers, private equity partners, and venture investors. These stakeholders are evaluating risk, scale, and return. They want to know where the company is going and why the destination is worth the journey.

At its core, the Business Plan articulates strategic intent. It defines the mission, the long-term objectives, and the differentiated value proposition that the company believes the market will reward. It frames the opportunity in language that aligns leadership, capital, and governance.

Market analysis in this context is necessarily high-level. It focuses on the total addressable market, industry dynamics, competitive positioning, and macro trends. The goal is not to explain how every deal will be won, but to establish that a meaningful opportunity exists and that the company has a credible right to pursue it.

Financial projections follow the same logic. They are built on broad assumptions: projected market share, average selling price, renewal and retention rates, inflation, and multi-year revenue targets. These numbers are directional. They signal ambition and scale rather than operational certainty.

Read the rest of the article…