Skip to content

analysis

What An MBA Didn’t Teach You About Sales

The sales profession is challenging. You need to work hard at it to succeed. You need to learn from the best. You need to improve your skills continuously. If you think you can sell since you are a hit at parties and have a lot of friends, you may soon find that you are a failure as a salesperson. Blunt truth:

because the sales profession is so hard, you have to focus on doing everything in sales very well, or you will be considered a failure.

I call this blog, Skinned Knees because I try to relate all of the learning that I have done over the past 4+ decades (while skinning my knees in the learning process).

I hope that you learn from my mistakes so that your business will grow!

AI Sales Coaching: How to Stop Rescuing Deals and Start Developing Salespeople

There is a dangerous moment in the growth of many B2B companies. It happens when the best salesperson becomes the sales manager.

The promotion seems obvious. This person consistently exceeds quota, understands customers, knows how to close difficult deals, and has earned the team’s respect. Who could be better qualified?

Six months later, that same person is personally rescuing the team’s largest opportunities, handling difficult customer objections, negotiating with executives, and keeping the forecast alive.

The company’s revenue looks healthy. The owner is satisfied. The sales manager appears indispensable.

And that is precisely the problem.

The company hasn’t developed a scalable sales organization. It has become dependent on one talented individual. Artificial intelligence offers an opportunity to change this pattern. But only if we rethink what sales management should accomplish.

The Difference Between Managing Deals and Developing Salespeople

Traditional sales management relies heavily on inspection and intervention. Managers review pipeline reports, examine forecasts, enforce activity requirements, and intervene when opportunities get into trouble. These activities are necessary, but they are not the same as coaching.

Consider a salesperson who confidently announces during a pipeline review that Mary is the Champion for a major opportunity. The manager suspects that Mary is simply a friendly contact who likes the product. An experienced manager might join the next customer meeting, take control of the conversation, and personally secure executive support. The opportunity might close. Unfortunately, the salesperson hasn’t developed the ability to identify and validate a real Champion.

A better manager asks a different question:

“What has Mary actually done that proves she is your Champion?”

Has Mary introduced the salesperson to important stakeholders? Has she explained the customer’s internal decision process? Has she advocated for the solution when the salesperson wasn’t present? Has she taken any personal risk to help the opportunity advance? If the salesperson cannot identify meaningful actions, the relationship remains an untested hypothesis.

The manager’s next responsibility isn’t to take over. It is to help the salesperson determine how to test that relationship. That coaching conversation improves the salesperson’s judgment, potentially affecting every future opportunity.

The objective of sales leadership is not to make the manager better at closing deals. It is to make the entire team better at closing deals.

Read the rest of the article…

AI Sales Automation: Why Your Chatbot Is Not a Sales Process

Imagine preparing for an important customer meeting. You open your favorite AI assistant, give it the prospect’s name, and ask for a summary of the company’s business challenges and the questions you should ask. Within seconds, you receive a beautifully written briefing. The assistant identifies potential operational problems, competitive pressures, and several opportunities to demonstrate the value of your solution.

There’s just one problem. One of those impressive insights concerns an acquisition the prospect supposedly completed last year.

Except the acquisition never happened.

The artificial intelligence fabricated a plausible business event and presented it as fact. Had you trusted the briefing, you might have opened your meeting with a question that immediately damaged your credibility.

This scenario illustrates a much larger problem with how B2B sales organizations use AI.

We’re asking artificial intelligence to perform too many different kinds of work without distinguishing which tasks require intelligence and which require reliable execution.

That distinction matters more than the sophistication of the AI model you choose.

The Problem Isn’t Just Hallucinations. It’s Process Design.

Salespeople increasingly rely on ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and other Generative AI applications to prepare for meetings, research prospects, write follow-up messages, and analyze opportunities. Those are legitimate applications of AI. In fact, I’d question why a salesperson with access to these capabilities wouldn’t use them. But consider what happens before the salesperson receives a useful answer.

They retrieve information from their CRM, gather previous meeting notes, identify stakeholders, check pricing, and reconstruct details from previous conversations. They paste everything into their AI assistant, ask a question, verify the response, and correct any mistakes.

Tomorrow, they repeat the process for another customer.

The AI may have improved the quality of their analysis, but the underlying sales process remains largely manual.

When twenty salespeople independently reconstruct the same process every day, you don’t have an AI adoption problem. You have a sales management problem.

You’re paying experienced professionals to repeatedly assemble information that your existing systems should already provide.

The solution isn’t necessarily better prompting. It’s better workflow design.

Read the rest of the article…

The Power Matrix: Mapping Who Really Decides

Every significant B2B purchase is shaped by more people than the salesperson ever meets. Some sign the contract, some recommend, some can quietly veto, and many simply have to live with the result. The Power Matrix puts that network on a single page.

It forces a salesperson to answer three questions about every major opportunity: Who can influence this decision? How much power does each of them really have? How well do we know them? A salesperson who can complete the Power Matrix for every account will be phenomenally successful. One who can’t will find that the empty cells show exactly where the deal is exposed.

This overview explains how the matrix is structured, how to build one, and how a sales leader can use it to judge the real health of the team’s largest opportunities.

An influence chart, not an organizational chart

The Power Matrix maps who influences one specific purchasing decision. It does not map who reports to whom. That single distinction drives everything else about the tool.

Two people on the same row may hold different titles, report to different executives, and work in different parts of the company. They’re on the same row because they carry roughly the same weight in this decision. Likewise, someone placed above another in a column does not need to be that person’s boss. They need to respect each other’s opinions.

Titles are a poor guide to power. A title often reflects tenure rather than influence, and a sharp Director can carry as much weight as a Vice President, especially across departments of very different sizes. Build the matrix by watching how people react to one another, whose opinion others seek, and whose objections stop a conversation.

Two versions, sized to the opportunity

The matrix comes in two sizes. The larger one requires far more research and relationship-building, so the deal must justify the effort.

CharacteristicSmall Power MatrixLarge Power Matrix
Grid3 × 35 × 5
People identified925
Departments35
Influence levels35
Typical deal sizeBelow roughly 5–10% of annual quotaAbove roughly 10% of annual quota
Center cellPrimary CoachPrimary Coach

The quota cutoff is a guideline, not a rule. Adjust it for your product and industry. As a sanity check, a salesperson with a reasonable win rate should rarely need more than about 10 Large Power Matrix analyses in a year. If someone is building 20 or more, the threshold is set too low, and they are spending large-deal effort on small deals.

Read the rest of the article…

Your Sales Compensation Plan Is Quietly Managing Your Sales Team

A salesperson reaches the final week of the quarter with a major opportunity ready to close. Legal has approved the agreement. The customer is prepared to move forward but asks for a 15 percent discount.

The salesperson understands what the discount does to margin. So does the sales manager. Finance knows as well. Yet the salesperson is measured on revenue, the manager needs the deal to make the quarterly forecast, and neither is directly rewarded for protecting margin.

The discount is approved. The deal closes. The commission increases. Everyone celebrates.

The company may have just paid someone extra to give away its profit.

No one acted dishonestly. The compensation plan worked precisely as designed. That is the problem.

Compensation Is a Management System

Most companies treat sales compensation as an administrative process. Leadership creates a plan, finance calculates payments, and managers resolve disputes when the numbers do not match expectations.

That view misses the strategic role compensation plays.

A compensation plan influences which customers salespeople pursue, how aggressively they discount, whether they favor one-year or multi-year agreements, how they collaborate, and whether they prioritize new business, renewals, margin, or market share.

What the company pays for will eventually outweigh what its leaders say they value.

Many sales leaders inherited plans that accumulated years of exceptions, temporary accelerators, regional variations, product overlays, split-credit rules, and special arrangements. The resulting spreadsheet may be technically functional while being strategically incoherent.

The warning signs are familiar:

Salespeople maintain private spreadsheets because they do not trust their commission statements.

Managers spend time resolving payout disputes instead of coaching pipeline.

Quotas are created by adding a percentage to last year’s number rather than analyzing territory potential.

A handful of top performers benefit from every contest while most of the team decides the competition is irrelevant.

These are not motivation problems. They are design problems that consume selling time, reduce margin, and erode trust.

Read the rest of the article…

How Bad CRM Data Breaks AI, Sales Processes, and Pipeline Growth

Most sales leaders do not have a prospecting problem. They have a data-confidence problem disguised as a prospecting problem.

The team is working. Reps are calling, emailing, sequencing, researching, and updating the CRM. But when the data is stale, duplicated, incomplete, or legally questionable, every downstream motion becomes weaker. Outreach gets slower. Messaging becomes less precise. Sales processes become harder to manage. Forecasts become less reliable. AI recommendations become faster, but not necessarily smarter.

That is the real issue with B2B sales intelligence today. Too many companies still evaluate data providers with a phonebook mentality. They ask who has the most contacts, the biggest database, the broadest coverage, or the lowest cost per seat. Those questions are easy to compare, but they rarely answer the question that matters: will this data perform against our ICP, in our market, inside our sales stack?

Artificial intelligence raises the standard. AI tools depend on clean, structured, identity-resolved data. If the CRM has three versions of the same person, five versions of the same account, outdated titles, invalid email addresses, disconnected phone numbers, and inconsistent fields, AI will not fix the problem. It will operationalize the problem.

Identity resolution is the missing discipline. It is the ability to recognize that the same person or company appears across multiple systems and create one authoritative record. Without it, lead scoring, personalization, enrichment, intent data, pipeline analysis, and Revenue management all become suspect.

This is why sales management must treat data infrastructure as a strategic operating issue, not a software-administration issue. Bad data burns money in several directions at once. You pay for the data subscription. You pay reps to manually verify what the subscription should have solved. You pay sales operations to clean up the mess. Then you lose revenue because your team is working on bad records while competitors are already in the right relationships.

Read the rest of the article…

The Dual Blueprint Requirement: Why Growth Demands Two Plans, Not One

Launching a company or steering one through a merger, turnaround, or major transition requires clarity about how value will be created and, just as importantly, how revenue will actually be generated.

Many leadership teams recognize the need for a Business Plan, but overlook that sustainable growth requires a second, complementary plan. The main breakdown is not the strategy itself, but the assumption that strategy automatically creates revenue. Bridging strategy and revenue requires a distinct plan for that conversion, targeting a different audience.

The Business Plan sets direction from the top down. The Sales Plan is validated by demonstrating how that direction can become actual revenue from the bottom up.

Both are essential. Neither works in isolation.

The Business Plan: Charting the Course (Top-Down)

The Business Plan exists to answer specific questions for a particular audience. Its primary readers are CEOs, CFOs, bankers, private equity partners, and venture investors. These stakeholders are evaluating risk, scale, and return. They want to know where the company is going and why the destination is worth the journey.

At its core, the Business Plan articulates strategic intent. It defines the mission, the long-term objectives, and the differentiated value proposition that the company believes the market will reward. It frames the opportunity in language that aligns leadership, capital, and governance.

Market analysis in this context is necessarily high-level. It focuses on the total addressable market, industry dynamics, competitive positioning, and macro trends. The goal is not to explain how every deal will be won, but to establish that a meaningful opportunity exists and that the company has a credible right to pursue it.

Financial projections follow the same logic. They are built on broad assumptions: projected market share, average selling price, renewal and retention rates, inflation, and multi-year revenue targets. These numbers are directional. They signal ambition and scale rather than operational certainty.

Read the rest of the article…

Sales Management with AI: Chat Interfaces vs. Automation Workflows

Sales organizations today face a critical decision: should they rely on interactive chat interfaces like ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini, or should they focus on automation workflows? The answer isn’t either/or. Each approach has unique strengths, and choosing the right one directly impacts sales processes, productivity, and revenue generation.

The problem many sales teams encounter is “random implementation.” They hear about a new AI tool, adopt it quickly, and use it for the wrong purpose. The result? Chat interfaces get bogged down with repetitive work, and automation gets tasked with jobs that require creativity and nuance. Misuse not only reduces efficiency but also frustrates teams and erodes trust in artificial intelligence altogether.

So how do you know when chat is the right fit? The decision comes down to task complexity and uniqueness. Chat excels in situations that require creativity, flexibility, and human judgment. Four categories consistently stand out:

  • Creative and strategic tasks: proposals, executive messaging, strategic planning, and competitive positioning.
  • Complex problem-solving: sales opportunity strategy sessions, unique customer needs, and crisis management.
  • Learning and development: role-playing objection handling, skill coaching, and competitive intelligence training.
  • Research and analysis: prospect research, market analysis, and strategic planning.
Read the rest of the article…

The AI Sales Process Map: The Ten-Stage Sales Process Framework

Sales leaders today often fall into the trap of using artificial intelligence tools randomly rather than systematically. This sporadic usage is like owning a Swiss Army knife but only using the bottle opener; you miss out on ninety percent of the available value. AI’s real power comes not from isolated tools but from integrating capabilities across every stage of your sales processes. When mapped correctly, AI accelerates every interaction, shortens sales cycles, and makes revenue generation more predictable.

Random AI adoption leads to inconsistent results. Some reps use it effectively, while others revert to manual methods under pressure, resulting in uneven performance. Systematic AI integration, however, compounds improvements across the entire sales cycle. Data captured at one stage strengthens the next, creating a virtuous cycle of sales success that is scalable, measurable, and sustainable. The outcome is not just faster deals, but stronger business acumen and more consistent revenue management.

The ten-stage AI sales process framework provides a structured way to apply AI:

  1. Prospecting,
  2. Outreach,
  3. Qualification,
  4. Scoping,
  5. Presentation,
  6. Economic Buyer meetings,
  7. Validation Events,
  8. Proposals,
  9. Closing,
  10. Onboarding/expansion.
Read the rest of the article…

Hiring for Growth: How to Build a Sales Team That Drives Long-Term Success

Building a successful sales team requires more than just filling open seats with available candidates. Company leadership must strategically align its hiring process with business objectives, market needs, and long-term goals. 

Whether you’re a solopreneur transitioning to a team-based approach or a CEO managing a growing sales force, the principles of intentional recruitment and onboarding remain the same. Hiring the right people is an investment in the future of your business.

One of the most common pitfalls in sales hiring is a lack of intentionality. Too often, small businesses hire out of convenience, choosing candidates from their immediate network or taking the first person who seems interested. While this approach may solve an immediate need, it rarely leads to long-term success. 

Hiring a salesperson means selecting someone who can actively drive growth and represent your brand with competence and integrity. The stakes are even higher when you’re working with a lean team; every hire matters, and mediocrity is not an option.

To avoid these missteps, it’s essential to approach hiring with the same rigor you apply to your sales process. Think of recruiting as a parallel to securing a high-value client. Just as you wouldn’t sell your product without qualifying leads or understanding their needs, you shouldn’t hire without a structured process to evaluate candidates. 

Begin by defining what success looks like for the role. What skills and attributes are non-negotiable? What specific outcomes do you expect this person to achieve within their first 90 days? A clear job description and measurable KPIs set the foundation for finding the right fit.

Cultural alignment is another critical factor. Your salespeople are the face of your business to prospects and customers. Their ability to embody your company’s values and mission can make or break the customer experience. A candidate might have a stellar track record, but if their approach clashes with your team’s culture, the partnership is unlikely to succeed. At the same time, skills and experience must align with the specific demands of the role. For instance, if your goal is aggressive market penetration, you need a hunter mentality, someone skilled in building relationships from scratch and closing deals in uncharted territory.

Read the rest of the article…